Draft Sanctions and Asset-Freezing Law (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- (P.10/2026) – Children’s Rights Impact Assessment
This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
STATES OF JERSEY
DRAFT SANCTIONS AND ASSET- FREEZING LAW (JERSEY) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 202- (P.10/2026) – CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Presented to the States on 22nd January 2026 by the Minister for External Relations
STATES GREFFE
2026 P.10 Add.
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT (CRIA)
PART 1: SCREENING
Name and title of Duty Bearer: Deputy Ian Gorst Type of Duty Bearer:
(Minister, Elected Member or States Minister Assembly Body)
Assessment completed by (if not
Private Secretary completed by duty bearer):
Date: 22nd January 2026
1) Name and brief description of the proposed decision Decision' means: • an Assembly proposition • an amendment (or further amendment) to a proposition • for Ministerial duty-bearers, policy under development |
The Sanctions and Asset-Freezing (Jersey) Law 2019 ("SAFL"), along with the Sanctions and Asset-Freezing (Implementation of External Sanctions) (Jersey) Order 2021 which is made under SAFL, are the key pieces of sanctions legislation, through which Jersey implements all United Nations sanctions and all autonomous UK sanctions. The Draft Sanctions and Asset-Freezing Law (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- (the "Draft Regulations") would, if adopted, ensure that sanctions implementation in Jersey remain aligned with the UK, where appropriate, and that the Minister for External Relations (the "Minister") continues to meet his international obligations in his role as competent authority for sanctions in Jersey. |
2) Which groups of children and young people are likely to be affected? Groups of children could include early years, primary or secondary education; young adults; children with additional learning needs; disabled children; children living in poverty; children from particular ethnic backgrounds; migrants; refugees; care experienced children and LGBTQ+ children |
The Draft Sanctions and Asset-Freezing Law (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202 are not likely to impact any specific groups of children. |
3) What is the likely impact of the proposed decision on children and on their rights? Impacts may be positive or negative, direct or indirect Include whether different groups of children will be affected differently by the decision |
The Draft Sanctions and Asset-Freezing Law (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202 are likely to neither positively or negatively impact children. |
4) Is a full Children's Rights Impact Assessment required? If you have identified impacts on children and their rights, a full CRIA should be completed. If no impacts are identified then a Full CRIA is not required, but please explain your rationale and how you reached this conclusion |
It is not considered that a full CRIA is required. |
Page - 2
P.10/2026 Add.