STATES OF JERSEY OFFICIAL REPORT

TUESDAY, 20th OCTOBER 2026

COMMUNICATIONS BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER...................................... 8

1.1  Tribute to Former Senator Bernard Binnigton......................................... 8 APPOINTMENT OF MINISTERS, COMMITTEES AND PANELS ........................ 8

2. Appointment of Members of the Jersey Police Authority .............................. 8

2.1  Senator H.M. Miles (The Minister for Justice and Home Affairs) ...................... 9

QUESTIONS....................................................................................... 9

3. Written Questions ........................................................................ 9

1. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding reviewing the zero-ten corporate tax regime. (WQ.176/2026) ............... 9
2. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the regulation and operation of taxis in Jersey. (WQ.177/2026)........................... 10
3. Deputy H.L. Jeune of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding the Dangerous Building Notice issued on 29th May 2026 in relation to properties situated on Rouge Bouillon, St. Helier . (WQ.178/2026) ........ 14
4. Connétable I. Gardiner of St. Helier of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the Public Realm Capital Programme and the Regeneration of St. Helier Programme. (WQ.179/2026) ......................................................................... 16
5. Deputy K.M. Wilson of St. Clement of the Minister for Sustainable Economic Development regarding inter-Island freight and passenger connectivity. (WQ.180/2026) ......................................................................... 21
6. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Social Security regarding the Transform Programme. (WQ.181/2026) ................................ 22
7. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding transfers into the Strategic Reserve. (WQ.182/2026) ....................... 23
8. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister of the Chief Minister regarding support for old-age pensioners during the cost-of-living crisis. (WQ.183/2026) ......................................................................... 23
9. Connétable A.N. Jehan of St. John of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the service Level Agreement between Children, Young People, Education and Skills and Jersey Property Holdings. (WQ.184/2026) ............................................ 27
10. Deputy H.L. Jeune of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity of the Minister for the Environment, Agriculture and Fisher ies regarding the commitment within the Proposed Common Strategic Policy 2026-2030 to revise the Carbon Neutral Roadmap. (WQ.186/2026) ............................................................. 28

11. Deputy H.L. Jeune of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the Northern sewer network upgrades. (WQ.187/2026) ..... 31
12. Deputy H.L. Jeune of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity of the Minister for Housing regarding the commitment to assisted purchase schemes in the Proposed Common Strategic Policy 2026-2030. (WQ.188/2026) .......................................... 34
13. Deputy K.M. Wilson of St. Clement of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding the plans for the Jersey Care Commission to begin regulating hospital, ambulance and Government-provided mental health services. (WQ.189/2026) ...... 36
14. Deputy K.M. Wilson of St. Clement of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding planning reforms. (WQ.190/2026) .......................................... 36
15. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Chief Minister regarding the 2027 staffing estimates included within the Annex to the Proposed Budget 2027-2030. (WQ.191/2026) ......................................................................... 38
16. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Chief Minister regarding staff savings contained within the Proposed Budget 2027-2030. (WQ.192/2026) .................. 44
17. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Minister for Social Security regarding the 2026 review of the Long-Term Care scheme. (WQ.193/2026) .................... 45
18. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central of the Minister for Housing regarding unoccupied Andium homes. (WQ.194/2026) .......................................... 47
19. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central of the Minister for Housing regarding the possible use of Andium accommodation for hospital construction workers. (WQ.195/2026) ......................................................................... 52
20. Deputy V. Li of St. Helier North of the Minister for Education and Li felong Learning regarding timetabled hours for full-time students aged 16-18 at Highlands College. (WQ.196/2026) ......................................................................... 53
21. Deputy V. Li of St. Helier North of the Minister for Education and Li felong Learning regarding open spaces at each Government school. (WQ.197/2026) .................. 54
22. Deputy V. Li of St. Helier North of the Chief Minister regarding the Government's response to online harms. (WQ.198/2026) ............................................. 59
23. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour of the Minister for the Environment, Agriculture and Fisher ies regarding the Asian Hornet population in Jersey. (WQ.199/2026) ......................................................................... 61
24. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour of the Minister for Education and Li felong Learning regarding the costs of extending funded school meals and the healthy start scheme. (WQ.200/2026) ................................................................ 65
25. Deputy K.M. Wilson of St. Clement of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding regulating medicinal cannabis clinics. (WQ.201/2026) ..................... 67
26. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Economic Development regarding the Government of Jersey and DFDS Jersey Sea Connectivity Concession Agreement. (WQ.202/2026) ............................................................ 68
27. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Economic Development regarding growing the economy. (WQ.203/2026) ..................................... 69
28. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Chair of the States Employment Board regarding public sector workers who currently reside outside Jersey. (WQ.204/2026) ......................................................................... 70
29. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour of the Minister for Education and Li felong Learning regarding extending the provision of free school meals. (WQ.205/2026) ... 71
30. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour of the Minister for Social Security regarding the provision of Heal thy Start Jersey vouchers for fresh fruit and vegetables. (WQ.206/2026) ......................................................................... 72

31. Deputy B.B. de S.D.V.M. Porée of St. Helier South of the Minister for Justice and Home Affairs regarding modern-slavery legislation. (WQ.207/2026) ................ 73
32. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Minister for Justice and Home Affairs regarding the £5 million allocated to Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG') in 2027. (WQ.208/2026)................................................................ 74
33. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding the decision not to include a stamp duty holiday for right-sizing in the Proposed Budget 2027-2030. (WQ.209/2026) ......................................... 93
34. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the traffic arrangements at the junction of Clarence Road and Pleasant Street. (WQ.210/2026) ......................................................................... 94
35. Deputy A.F. Curtis of St. Clement of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding his proposal in the Proposed Budget 2027-2030 to introduce "Tax Warehouses for Investment Assets". (WQ.211/2026) ................................. 95
36. Deputy A.F. Curtis of St. Clement of the Chief Minister regarding the statement that "from 2025 and beyond, the delivery of the Digital Services Platform (the Platform) shall be built and designed following open design principles". (WQ.212/2026) ...... 97
37. Deputy A.F. Curtis of St. Clement of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding a separate VED category and rate for motorhomes. (WQ.213/2026) ....... 99
38. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding inspections of agricultural staff accommodation. (WQ.214/2026) ........ 100
39. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding inspection and enforcement activities carried out under the Public Heal th and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Jersey) Law 2018. (WQ.215/2026) ................ 102
40. Deputy K.M. Wilson of St. Clement of the Minister for Heal th and Social Services regarding introducing a regulatory framework for medicinal cannabis clinics in Jersey. (WQ.217/2026) ........................................................................ 103
41. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour of the Minister for Education and Li felong Learning regarding the Jersey Premium (JP) funding programme. (WQ.218/2026) . 104

4. Oral Questions .......................................................................... 107

1. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central of the Minister for Housing regarding measurable improvements in the availability and affordability of rented family homes. (OQ.96/2026) ................................................................... 107

Deputy M.R. Ferey of St. Saviour (The Minister for Housing):............................ 107

1. Deputy L.V. Feltham : ................................................................. 107
2. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South: .............................................. 107
3. Deputy S.J. Gleave : ................................................................... 108
4. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade : ..................................................... 108
5. Deputy M. Tadier : .................................................................... 108
6. Deputy C.S. Alves of St. Helier Central:.............................................. 108
7. Deputy C.S. Alves : .................................................................... 109
8. Deputy K.F. Morel of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity : ........................... 109
9. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée of St. Helier South: ................................... 109
10. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée : ..................................................... 109
11. Deputy L.V. Feltham : .............................................................. 110

2. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée of St. Helier South of the Minister for Economic Development regarding delivery of the Better Business Support Package for

employers and employees during the transition towards a living wage. (OQ.102/2026) .......................................................................... 110

Deputy F.G. Voisin of St. Helier North (The Minister for Economic Development): ...... 110

1. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée : ........................................................ 111
2. Deputy L.D. Carpenter of St. Helier Central: ......................................... 111
3. Deputy L.D. Carpenter : ............................................................... 111
4. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade : ..................................................... 112
5. Deputy M. Tadier : .................................................................... 112
6. Deputy K.F. Morel of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity : ........................... 112
7. Deputy B. Ward of St. Clement : ...................................................... 113
8. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée : ........................................................ 113

3. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St Helier North of the Chief Minister regarding a Public Services Ombudsperson. (OQ.90/2026)............................................... 113

Senator L.J. Farnham (The Chief Minister): ................................................ 113 4.3.1 Deputy M.B. Andrews :................................................................ 113

4. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding the introduction of an industrial rate of electricity. (OQ.94/2026) ...... 114

Senator A.J.H.M. Maclean (The Minister for Treasury and Resources): ................... 114

1. Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 114
2. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade : ..................................................... 114
3. Deputy M. Tadier : .................................................................... 115
4. Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 115

5. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Chief Minister regarding the £9,635,000 savings identified as resulting from Roles', within the Proposed Budget 2027-2030. (OQ.100/2026) ............................................................. 115

Deputy M.R. Ferey of St. Saviour (Vice-Chair, States Employment Board - rapporteur): . 116 4.5.1 Deputy S.J. Gleave : ................................................................... 116

6. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade of the Minister for Education and Li felong Learning regarding a review of the general provision and regulation of nursery care in Jersey. (OQ.98/2026) .......................................................... 116

Deputy L.K.F. Stephenson of St. Mary , St. Ouen and St. Peter (Assistant Minister for

Education and Li felong Learning - rapporteur): ...................................... 116

1. Deputy M. Tadier : .................................................................... 117
2. Deputy V. Li of St. Helier North: ..................................................... 117
3. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour :............................................... 117
4. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet : .............................................................. 118

7. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée of St. Helier South of the Minister for Justice and Home Affairs regarding suitable accommodation for migrant workers. (OQ.103/2026) .......................................................................... 118

Senator H.M. Miles (The Minister for Justice and Home Affairs): ......................... 118

1. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée : ........................................................ 119
2. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central: .......................................... 119
3. Deputy L.V. Feltham : ................................................................. 119
4. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade : ..................................................... 119
5. Deputy M. Tadier : .................................................................... 120

6. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour :............................................... 120
7. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet : .............................................................. 120
8. Deputy B.B. de S.V.M. Porée : ........................................................ 120

8. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South of the Minister for Economic Development regarding consideration of a commercial tenancy law. (OQ.95/2926) .............. 120

Deputy F.G. Voisin of St. Helier North (The Minister for Economic Development): ...... 121 4.8.1 Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 121

9. Connétable T. Palmer of St. Lawrence of the Minister for Economic Development regarding support to private sector employers competing with public sector wages. (OQ.92/2026) ............................................................................ 121

Deputy F.G. Voisin of St. Helier North (The Minister for Economic Development):: ..... 121

10. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding funding to improve Cheapside. (OQ.97/2026) ............................ 121

Deputy J. Renouf of St. Brelade (The Minister for Infrastructure): ........................ 122

1. Deputy L.V. Feltham : .............................................................. 122
2. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South: ........................................... 122
3. Deputy S.J. Gleave : ................................................................ 123
4. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade : .................................................. 123
5. Deputy M. Tadier :.................................................................. 123
6. Deputy L.V. Feltham : .............................................................. 124

11. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding the Enforcement Notice issued to the owners of the former Nude Dunes site. (OQ.99/2026) ...................................................................... 124

Senator Sir M.J. Boleat (The Minister for Planning and Regulation): ...................... 124 4.11.1   Deputy M. Tadier :.................................................................. 124

12. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding removing or amending taxi restrictions and requirements. (OQ.101/2026) ........ 125

Deputy J. Renouf of St. Brelade (The Minister for Infrastructure): ........................ 125

1. Deputy S.J. Gleave : ................................................................ 125
2. Deputy A.F. Curtis of St. Clement : ................................................ 125
3. Deputy A.F. Curtis : ................................................................ 126
4. Deputy K.F. Morel of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity : ........................ 126
5. Deputy K.F. Morel : ................................................................ 127
6. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South: ............................................ 127
7. Deputy T.A. Coles : ................................................................ 127
8. Deputy M. Tadier :.................................................................. 127
9. Deputy M. Tadier :.................................................................. 127
10. Deputy G.A. Raimondo of St. Brelade : .......................................... 128
11. Deputy G.A. Raimondo :.......................................................... 128
12. Deputy S.J. Gleave : .............................................................. 129

5. Questions to Ministers without notice - The Minister for Justice and Home Affairs

 ........................................................................................... 129

1. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South: ............................................... 129 Senator H.M. Miles (The Minister for Justice and Home Affairs): ......................... 129

2. Deputy A.F. Curtis of St. Clement : ................................................... 129

5.2.1 Deputy A.F. Curtis : ................................................................... 130

3. Deputy A. Maltman of St. Mary , St. Ouen and St. Peter : ............................ 130
4. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South: .............................................. 130

5.4.1 Deputy S.J. Gleave : ................................................................... 131

5. Deputy L.M.C. Doublet of St. Saviour :............................................... 131

5.5.1 Deputy L.M.C. Doublet : .............................................................. 131

6. Deputy A.F. Curtis : ................................................................... 132

5.6.1 Deputy A.F. Curtis : ................................................................... 132

7. Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 132

5.7.1 Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 132

8. Deputy G.A. Raimondo of St. Brelade : ............................................... 132

5.8.1 Deputy G.A. Raimondo : .............................................................. 132

9. Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 133

5.9.1 Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 133

6. Questions to Ministers without notice - The Minister for Planning and Regulation

 ........................................................................................... 133

1. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South: ............................................... 133 Senator Sir M.J. Boleat (The Minister for Planning and Regulation): ...................... 133

1. Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 133
   2. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South: .............................................. 134

6.2.1 Deputy S.J. Gleave : ................................................................... 134

3. Deputy L.D. Carpenter of St. Helier Central: ......................................... 134
4. Deputy B. Ward of St. Clement : ...................................................... 134

6.4.1 Deputy B. Ward : ...................................................................... 135

5. Deputy L.V. Feltham of St. Helier Central: .......................................... 135

6.5.1 Deputy L.V. Feltham : ................................................................. 136

6. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade : ..................................................... 136

6.6.1 Deputy M. Tadier : .................................................................... 136

7. Deputy A.F. Curtis of St. Clement : ................................................... 136
8. Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 137

6.8.1 Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 137

7. Questions to Ministers without notice - The Chief Minister ........................ 138

1. Connétable A.N. Jehan of St. John : ................................................... 138 Senator L.J. Farnham (The Chief Minister): ................................................ 138

1. The Connétable of St. John : .......................................................... 138
   2. Deputy C.J. Rebindaine of St. Mary , St. Ouen and St. Peter : ........................ 138

7.2.1 Deputy C.J. Rebindaine : .............................................................. 139

3. Deputy T.A. Coles of St. Helier South: ............................................... 139

7.3.1 Deputy T.A. Coles : .................................................................... 139

4. Deputy A. Maltman of St. Mary , St. Ouen and St. Peter : ............................ 140

7.4.1 Deputy A. Maltman : .................................................................. 140

5. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South: .............................................. 140

7.5.1 Deputy S.J. Gleave : ................................................................... 141

6. Deputy C.D. Leck of St. Saviour :..................................................... 141

7.6.1 Deputy C.D. Leck : .................................................................... 141

PUBLIC BUSINESS ............................................................................ 141

8. Jersey Overseas Aid Commission: appointment of a Commissioner (P.67/2026) .. 141

8.1   Deputy A. Maltman of St. Mary , St. Ouen and St. Peter (Jersey Overseas Aid

Commission - rapporteur): ............................................................ 142

1. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South: .............................................. 142
2. Deputy A. Maltman : .................................................................. 143

ARRANGEMENT OF PUBLIC BUSINESS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS ................ 144

9. Deputy C.S. Alves of St. Helier Central (Chair, Privileges and Procedures Committee): ........................................................................... 144

ADJOURNMENT .............................................................................. 144

[9:30]

The Roll was called and the Greffier of the States led the Assembly in Prayer. COMMUNICATIONS BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER

The Bailiff :

1.1  Tribute to Former Senator Bernard Binnigton

I would like to say a few words in tribute to former Senator Bernard Binnington who died a few days ago at the age of 95. Born in Jersey in 1930, Bernard Thomas Binnington was educated at Victoria College and then went into the family business established by his grandparents, namely running the Chelsea Hotel in Gloucester Street alongside his brothers. He married his wife, Elizabeth, better known as Betty, and the couple had 2 children, Alan and Anne. In 1965, he became president of the Hotel and Guesthouse Association, latterly the Hospitality Association, and remained a staunch advocate for the tourism industry for many years, notably pushing for there to be a strategic plan to counter the emerging threat from cheap Mediterranean holidays. He joined the States as a Deputy for St. Helier No. 2 District in December 1969, and served as such until November 1975, when he was elected as a Senator, a role in which he served for 3 terms before deciding not to stand again in December 1993. While a Deputy , he sought to improve States housing in his constituency and to provide more recreational facilities for young people. He served on many committees during his time in the Assembly, including Tourism, Finance and Economics, the Etat Civil, and was president of the Harbours and Airports Committee for 9 years, from 1984 until 1993. As President of the Agriculture and Fisher ies Committee between 1975 and 1993, he brought forward subsidies for heating oil for greenhouse growers to help them remain competitive against European growers. He very much enjoyed his time as president of that committee, despite, or perhaps because of, him not having a farming background. He was able to unite the farming community and encourage co-operative working, and in consequence enjoyed significant support during elections in the country Parishes. He was also the States nominated director for the J.E.C. (Jersey Electricity Company) for 12 years until 1988, and oversaw the laying of Jersey's first cabling with France, where his fluency in French, having a grandmother who was born in Brittany, was invaluable in negotiations with his French counterparts. In a political era known for lengthy debates, Bernard Binnington was highly regarded for his concise and targeted communication. Fellow Members noted he possessed the art of saying in a few moments what others would labour over for a fortnight, often utilising sharp wit to simplify complex propositions. He gained a reputation as a pragmatic, straight-talking and highly influential business-minded statesman. Following his retirement from the States, he and his wife were able to spend more time at their holiday home in Brittany, in effect going back to his Breton roots. In 1994, he was given an O.B.E. (Order of the British Empire) in the Queen's Birt hday Honours Li st for his services to the community in Jersey. Our thoughts are with his family at this difficult time, and I ask Members to rise for a minute's silence in his memory. [Silence] May he rest in peace.

Senator L.J. Farnham :

May I raise the défaut on Senator Gorst ?

The Bailiff :

Are Members content to raise the défaut? The défaut is raised on Senator Gorst . APPOINTMENT OF MINISTERS, COMMITTEES AND PANELS

2. Appointment of Members of the Jersey Police Authority

The Bailiff :

Under F we have Appointment of Members of the Jersey Police Authority. The Jersey Police Authority consists of not less than 5, nor more than 7, members, up to 2 of which are elected Members of the States.

[9:45]

Article 5(6) of the States of Jersey Police Force Law 2012 stipulates that none of the following may be appointed as a member of the Police Authority: a police officer, a person who is a member of the Honorary Police, an officeholder of a Crown appointment, the Minister or his or her Assistant Minister, a Connétable , a States employee, a person who is bankrupt, whether under the law of Jersey or under the law of a country or territory outside Jersey, a person who has been a police officer at any time during the previous 5 years, or a person who has been a member of the Honorary Police at any time during the previous 5. Furthermore, in 2014, it was recognised that serving on the Children, Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel could potentially constitute a conflict of interest with membership of the Jersey Police Authority. With that in mind, the Assembly is asked to appoint 2 elected Members to the Jersey Police Authority, and I invite the Minister for Justice and Home Affairs to make her nominations.

2.1  Senator H.M. Miles (The Minister for Justice and Home Affairs)

I would like to nominate Deputy Carina Alves and Deputy Tom Coles for the role as members of the Police Authority.

The Bailiff :

Are the nominations seconded? [Seconded]  Are there any other nominations? If there are no other nominations, I can declare that Deputy Alves and Deputy Coles have been appointed as members of the Jersey Police Authority. [Approbation]

QUESTIONS

3. Written Questions

1. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding reviewing the zero-ten corporate tax regime. (WQ.176/2026)

Question

Will the Minister advise what consideration, if any, has been given to reviewing the zero-ten corporate tax regime?

Answer

The Time to Win Competitiveness Report stressed the importance of a simple and stable tax regime, with competitive tax rates and tax neutrality at its core. This is central to Jersey's ability to position itself as a leading financial centre.

In light of this clear strategic direction on competitiveness and also the implementation of the OECD Pillar Two regime for large multinational enterprises, no consideration is being given to changing the Zero/Ten tax regime.

2. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the regulation and operation of taxis in Jersey. (WQ.177/2026)

Question

In relation to the regulation and operation of taxis in Jersey, will the Minister –

1. advise what consideration, if any, has been given to reviewing and updating the regulatory framework to –

1. reduce operating costs and improve affordability;
2. increase flexibility to meet customer needs;
3. support the Island's night-time economy;
4. increase availability of services for passengers;

while maintaining safety, accessibility and passenger-protection standards;

2. provide an update on the implementation of the Taxi-Cab Regulation Reform Programme, approved in 2015, including completed and outstanding actions;
3. publish a complete list of current requirements required of taxi drivers and vehicle licence- holders, identifying for each –

1. its stated purpose;
2. the relevant legislation or legal authority;
3. who authorised it;
4. whether it received Assembly approval; and
5. whether Driver and Vehicle Standards (DVS) has assessed that it falls within its authority; and

4. state whether he will work with relevant stakeholders to review these requirements and identify any that could be removed or simplified to allow reductions in costs and improve flexibility, while maintaining safety, accessibility and passenger-protection standards?"

Answer

It is worth putting my answers to these questions in context. As the Minister for Infrastructure, I have a legal obligation to ensure that the public has access to an adequate, efficient and reasonably priced cab service available throughout Jersey at all times.' As Minister, I exercise powers under the Motor Traffic (Jersey) Law 1935 for that purpose.

1. I recognise that there is a public debate regarding the regulation and operation of the taxi service in Jersey. Work is commencing to review the regulatory framework in line with my primary duties to the public under the Motor Traffic Law. A secondary, but important, consideration is the reasonable expectation of drivers and other industry participants to make a living, as a sustainable industry is necessary to serve passengers well. The areas referenced in (i) to (iv) will be part of this work.
2. The Taxi-Cab Regulation Reform Programme was approved in 2015 following public consultation. It introduced or progressed:

• a more integrated taxi-cab system and wider rank access;

• common maximum fares and clearer tariff arrangements;

• meters, fare displays and electronic payments;

• improved accessibility standards and driver training;

• enhanced driver-suitability checks; and

• affiliation with recognised booking entities.

Some elements were not completed as originally envisaged, including statutory licensing of booking entities, a comprehensive disciplinary system, aspects of common vehicle identity and formal complaints arrangements.

The work which I will now undertake will establish a comprehensive analysis of which elements were completed, superseded or remain outstanding, and whether further implementation remains appropriate.

3. The current requirements that apply to taxi drivers and vehicle licence-holders arise from a combination of provisions stipulated in the Motor Traffic (Jersey) Law 1935, Orders made under that Law, public service vehicle licence conditions, driver-badge requirements, and administrative arrangements operated by Driver and Vehicle Standards.

The principal requirements include:

• a public service vehicle licence for each vehicle used as a cab;

• compliance with the conditions stated in that licence;

• a current certificate of fitness and compliance with vehicle, equipment and accessibility standards;

• ownership of the vehicle by the licence applicant and continued fitness and propriety of the licence-holder;

• display of the public service vehicle licence plate and prescribed passenger information;

• an  appropriate  driver  badge,  based  on  age,  health,  character,  driving  capability  and knowledge of Jersey;

• approved taxi signs, meters and electronic-payment facilities;

• compliance with the statutory maximum-fare arrangements for immediate hire (pre-booked fares are not regulated but must be published);

• compliance with the rules governing ranks and pre-arranged services; and

• reporting of relevant vehicle damage, alterations and changes of ownership.

These requirements have a direct basis in the Law or subordinate legislation. The Law also permits the Minister to impose conditions on a vehicle's public service licence where the Minister considers them necessary or desirable to ensure the proper operation of the vehicle and the public service it provides. Such conditions may address who may operate the vehicle, the manner and times in which the service is operated and, for cabs, the use of taxi stands.

Further  operational  requirements  have  been  introduced  over  time  through  standard  licence conditions or Ministerial policy. These include, or have included:

• a minimum annual mileage requirement;

• taxi driving being the licence-holder's main employment;

• affiliation with a recognised booking or dispatch entity;

• an initial period gaining experience through an established company;

• affiliation with only one booking entity;

• restrictions on third-party advertising;

• wheelchair-assistance training;

• periodic criminal-record checks; and

• quantitative control of vehicle licences.

Purpose

The statutory and operational requirements have generally been intended to support the Minister's duty under Article 38 of the Motor Traffic (Jersey) Law 1935 to secure, so far as practicable, an adequate, efficient and reasonably priced cab service throughout Jersey at all times.

Their purposes include ensuring that:

• vehicles are safe, suitable, identifiable and accessible;

• drivers are competent, medically fit, of appropriate character and accountable;

• licences are actively used to provide a public service;

• bookings, journeys and complaints can be traced to an accountable person or entity;

• fares are transparent and reasonably controlled;

• sufficient services are available at different times and locations; and

• regulated services can be monitored and enforced.

Legislation or legal authority

The most relevant provisions of the Motor Traffic (Jersey) Law 1935 are:

• Articles 6 to 13, concerning vehicle licensing, certificates of fitness, licence conditions, quantitative limits, enforcement and licence plates;

• Articles 28 to 33, concerning driver badges and the driver's age, health, character, driving capability and knowledge of Jersey;

• Article 37, concerning conduct, taxi ranks and codes of conduct;

• Article 38, concerning fares, vehicles, equipment, signs, advertising, plying for hire and rank access; and

• Article 46, providing general Order-making powers.

Authorisation

A number of requirements are contained in primary Law and in Orders. Other requirements have been authorised through Ministerial Decisions, individual or standard licence conditions, or administrative arrangements developed by Driver and Vehicle Standards and its predecessor authorities. Some practices may originate in decisions of former Committees, or in historic paper licence conditions. In some cases, the complete original decision trail may no longer be readily identifiable.

I am clear that the present situation is not satisfactory. It is overly complex and not sufficiently transparent. It is also unacceptable that some regulatory requirements are being imposed when these appear to be based only on convention. Therefore, my aim is that one outcome of the current review will be an updated regulatory framework which will have a clear basis in statute and policy. It will be published as a single document which is publicly available.

DVS assessment of authority

Driver and Vehicle Standards administers the current framework on behalf of the Minister and applies the statutory requirements, licence conditions and Ministerial policies in its day-to-day regulatory work.

However, as referenced above, there is not presently a single, legally verified and published schedule demonstrating that every inherited licence condition or administrative requirement has recently been assessed against its precise statutory authority.

I am keen to look forward. Rather than devote disproportionate resources to reconstruct what may remain an incomplete historic record, I will produce a new authoritative schedule. For each requirement that is to continue, that schedule will identify:

• the requirement and the person to whom it applies;

• its purpose and intended public benefit;

• its legislative, licence-based or administrative authority;

• how and by whom it has been authorised;

• the body responsible for its administration and enforcement; and

• the date on which it should next be reviewed.

Each existing requirement will be considered against current circumstances and retained only where it is necessary and proportionate. The resulting framework will be supported by the necessary legislation, Ministerial Decisions, Orders, clearly stated licence conditions or, where required, proposals for legislative amendment.

The intention is to publish the completed schedule so that taxi drivers, vehicle licence-holders, booking  entities,  passengers,  the  regulator  and  future  Ministers  can  readily  identify  the requirements in force and the authority for them.

4. Yes, this work will involve full consultation with the industry and relevant stakeholders to ensure  we  deliver  a  modern  regulatory  framework  which  best  serves  islanders  and discharges my obligations under the Law.

3. Deputy H.L. Jeune of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding the Dangerous Building Notice issued on 29th May 2026 in relation to properties situated on Rouge Bouillon, St. Helier . (WQ.178/2026)

Question

Further to the Dangerous Building Notice issued on 29th May 2026 in relation to the properties known as Ash ton Villa (106) and Channel Mews (108), situated on Rouge Bouillon, St. Helier , will the Minister advise –

1. whether the remedial works constituted a permanent or a temporary repair;
2. if the remedial works were a temporary repair, the extent of, and responsibility for, any further work required, and the timeframe for this work to take place;
3. the total cost to the Government of the remedial works and traffic management measures, the costs recovered to date and steps to be taken to recover any remaining costs from the property owners; and
4. whether any enforcement action has been taken or will be taken for non-compliance with the Dangerous Building Notice?

Answer

1. The works specified in a dangerous building notice are limited to those works required to make the building safe, and the direct action taken did not include further repairs of a permanent or temporary nature. The site was handed over in a safe condition to the landowners, and any further repairs or works are the responsibility of the owners.
2. Any further works required to reconstruct the walls are the responsibility of the owners of the land.
3. Works related to removing the danger amounted to £23,390.67 as follows:

• Engineer's report and oversight: £1,159.20

• Main contractor: £18,484.99

• Emergency electricity work: £3746.48

Road closure and traffic management costs totalled £3,133.50

Officers are at present in the process of determining the proportion of costs to be assigned and recovered from the respective owners pursuant to Art.69 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002, and the issuing of invoices is imminent. Failure to pay the reasonable costs will result in debt recovery in accordance with appropriate debt recovery procedures in association with the Law Officers Department.

4. The undertaking of the works in default under Art.69 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002 constitutes enforcement action. Failure to comply with a dangerous building notice is an offence under Art.70 of the Law, and the Regulation Directorate is presently carefully considering its position, taking into account the guidance provided by the LOD regarding referrals of regulatory breaches, and acknowledging that the Attorney General is the ultimate authority in respect of all prosecutions in the Island.

4. Connétable I. Gardiner of St. Helier of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the Public  Realm  Capital Programme  and  the Regeneration  of  St.  Helier  Programme. (WQ.179/2026)

Question

In relation to the Public Realm Capital Programme and the Regeneration of St. Helier Programme, will the Minister provide details of the total budget allocated and the total expenditure incurred for each year from 2021 to 2026 inclusive; and for each programme and each year, provide a breakdown of each project, scheme, workstream or item of expenditure funded wholly or partly from those budgets to include, but not be limited to –

1. the name of the project, scheme, workstream or expenditure item;
2. the amount budgeted in that year;
3. the amount spent in that year; and
4. the current status of the project, scheme or workstream;

and will the Minister advise whether the sum of the individual amounts budgeted and spent in (a) to (d) above reconcile with the total budget for each annual programme and, if not, explain the discrepancies?

Answer

The following tables show the projects, schemes, workstreams and expenditure items and the corresponding budget at the start of the year, spend at the end of the year and difference between spend and budget for each year from 2021 to 2026 inclusive:

2021

2022

* Income 2023

2024

2025

2026

Difference between Expenditure and Budget

Further time is required to provide a comprehensive and accurate explanation of the differences between expenditure and budget for each project, scheme, workstream and expenditure item. This is an extensive piece of work, involving tracking multiple contracts across different years. This information, including the current status of each project, scheme or workstream as requested in (d), will be provided by Friday 30th October 2026.

5. Deputy  K.M.   Wilson  of  St.  Clement  of  the  Minister  for  Sustainable  Economic Development regarding inter-Island freight and passenger connectivity. (WQ.180/2026)

Question

In relation to inter-island freight and passenger connectivity, will the Minister advise –

1. what  options  are  under  consideration  to  further  develop  connectivity,  including  the frequency of services and freight and passenger carrying capacity, and the estimated annual costs of each option;
2. what options, if any, would require Government to make a financial contribution, provide a subsidy or any other financial support;
3. whether  any  such  options  would  require  modification  to  any  existing  Government contracts, or the introduction of a new Government contract, with the private sector; and
4. whether he intends to promote greater competition in the market for inter-island freight and passenger connectivity?

Answer

1. I have held positive discussions with my counterpart in Guernsey and we are aligned on the need to work together, and with ferry operators, to identify opportunities for improving sea and air connectivity between the islands. Options under consideration include inter-island provision from Jersey and Guernsey's principal ferry operators, but I am also keen to engage  the  wider  maritime  industry  on  innovative  solutions  which  could  provide  a sustainable blend of passengers services, and a requisite level of vehicle capacity when necessary.
2. Demand for inter-island travel has, in recent years, not been especially strong, particularly outside the peak visitor season. For example, during DFDS's high-speed inter-island trial in  2025,  passenger  volumes  were  reported  to  be  significantly  below  commercially sustainable levels. Any investment in services must represent value for taxpayers' money. As  we  continue  to  examine  sustainable  options  in  Jersey,  and  with  our  partners  in Guernsey, any financial support, and our approach to it, remain under evaluation.

3. Government's Concession Agreement with DFDS does not cover inter-island arrangements; it is principally focussed on Jersey's freight supply chain and core passenger routes to the UK and France. I would prefer first to see market-led solutions over further government contract expansion or regulation but I am of course prepared to consider any approach which secures sustainable inter-island connectivity.
4. In awarding separate contracts to respective principal ferry operators, both Bailiwicks acknowledge the need for those ferry companies to make a fair and reasonable return on their passenger and freight operations. In this respect, competition is not a component of Jersey's Concession Agreement with  DFDS.  This  agreement was reached through a competitive process. However, Jersey's Sea Transport Policy allows any ferry operator to apply for a ramp licence to operate inter-island services between the Bailiwicks of Jersey and Guernsey. In addition, opportunities may also exist to improve air services between Jersey and Guernsey. We will continue discussions with Guernsey regarding its Air Route Li censing framework and whether there may be scope for additional operators to enhance connectivity and capacity between the islands.

6. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Social Security regarding the Transform Programme. (WQ.181/2026)

Question

In relation to the Transform Programme which received £12,500,000 funding in the Government Plan 2023-2026, will the Minister advise the total spend to date, the expected cost of completing the Programme, and if the costs exceed the original funding approved, detail the cost variances and provide a reason for each?

Answer

The Transform Programme is a multi-year programme, with work commencing in 2021 and scheduled to finish in 2028. The Budget 2027-2030 includes the most up-to-date programme budget of £30.6 million.

As at the end of 2025, the programme had spent £6.4 million. During 2026 the programme moved into delivery and so the rate of spending has increased. A further £3.4 million has been spent in 2026 (to the end of August), bringing total spend to £9.8 million

The programme is currently forecasting to deliver within the total budget of £30.6 million. The Transform programme is being rigorously managed to support the efficient delivery of the programme on time, and on budget. The Programme is in regular contact with the Social Security Minister with updates on budgetary and operational matters.

7. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister for Treasury and Resources regarding transfers into the Strategic Reserve. (WQ.182/2026)

Question

Will the Minister advise the total amount the Government intends to transfer into the Strategic Reserve, excluding prior year basis (PYB) taxation income and investment income, within the next 20 years and if he is not able to do so, will he explain why not?

Answer

The Council of Ministers and I remain committed to firstly rebuilding the Stabilisation Fund and then strengthening Strategic Reserve over time, consistent with the recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Panel and the Common Strategic Policy objective of maintaining financial stability.

The exact amount of the transfer will depend upon the return to budget surpluses and investment return performance over the period until the debt is repaid. I will provide more detail in the budget 2028-2030.

8. Deputy M.B. Andrews of St. Helier North of the Minister of the Chief Minister regarding support for old-age pensioners during the cost-of-living crisis. (WQ.183/2026)

Question

Will the Chief Minister advise what actions Government is taking, and intends to take, to support old-age pensioners during the cost-of-living crisis?

Answer

The Government provides a wide range of support to Jersey's older residents that are targeted solely or principally to those over pension age.

In addition to provided assistance with living costs, the Jersey Old Age Pension rose by 4.7% from the beginning of October 2026, in line with a formula that ensures that pensioners always receive an increase that at least matches the pensioner RPI figure for the June quarter and provides a higher increase when wages have grown faster than prices.

A list of main benefits and support is set out in the table below.

In addition to the above, subject to States Assembly approval, the proposed Budget 2027-30 also includes an additional one-off payment of £200 per household to all current recipients of the Community Cost Bonus (CCB). While not limited to pensioner households, over three-quarters of CCB payments are made to pensioner households.

The  proposed  Common  Strategic  Policy  also  includes  a  commitment  (1.6)  to  reviewing affordability, with Ministers seeking to: "identify how we can increase household resilience and improve Islanders' real living standards over the course of the term". This includes Jersey's old- age pensioners.

The Older Persons Li ving Forum is a direct route for pensioners to raise issues with Ministers and Government Departments. The Group meets every two months and discusses a wide range of issues. This remains an appropriate forum through which further action could be considered to support old-age pensioners with cost-of-living pressures.

9. Connétable A.N. Jehan of St. John of the Minister for Infrastructure regarding the service Level Agreement between Children, Young People, Education and Skills and Jersey Property Holdings. (WQ.184/2026)

Question

In accordance with the Service Level Agreement between Children, Young People, Education and Skills (CYPES') and Jersey Property Holdings, will the Minister –

1. advise whether monthly income declarations have been completed for each month that CYPES' educational facilities have been leased on a short-term basis; and
2. provide a breakdown of the monthly income declared from each CYPES' facility leased on a short-term basis over the previous 12 months?

Answer

All buildings within the CYPES estate are owned by Jersey Property Holdings, who similarly operate all leases. Educational facilities are not formally leased to any third party, and no lease income is therefore received. Accordingly, no declarations are completed or received in this respect.

Educational establishments do hire out facilities, although such bookings do not constitute a lease arrangement. The terms for third party use of educational facilities are set out here – Policy for third party use of Education premises.

At present, responsibility for the hire of educational facilities rests with individual institutions, and the reporting of income follows that scheme of delegation.

The effective and co-ordinated use of the public estate is a priority for the new infrastructure ministerial team, as it was for the Connétable during his time as Minister. This includes ensuring that public property is being utilised effectively at all times for the benefit of the community, and that income received for the use of public facilities contributes towards the long-term upkeep and maintenance of those facilities. Work is ongoing in these respects and we would welcome the opportunity to work with the Connétable to achieve our mutual objective.

10. Deputy H.L. Jeune of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity of the Minister for the Environment, Agriculture and Fisher ies regarding the commitment within the Proposed Common  Strategic  Policy  2026-2030  to  revise  the  Carbon  Neutral  Roadmap. (WQ.186/2026)

Question

In relation to the commitment within the Proposed Common Strategic Policy 2026-2030 to revise the Carbon Neutral Roadmap, will the Minister advise –

1. the proposed process for updating the Roadmap and the date on which a revised version will be presented;
2. how the update process differs from the original and whether a Citizens' Assembly or equivalent will be held and, if not, why not;
3. the proposed stakeholders to be involved in the revision and how their views will be recorded and published;
4. the measures to be used to determine whether a policy is "practical" and "affordable", including whether affordability will be assessed for households, businesses, public finances or all three; what cost or distributional thresholds will apply, and whether the long-term cost of not acting will be included in that assessment;
5. which evidence in the current Roadmap is no longer fit for purpose, what new evidence will be commissioned including who will produce it and whether it will be published;
6. the estimated amount required for the revised Roadmap and any measures to be taken to increase the Climate Emergency Fund; and
7. whether the 2030 interim emissions target will be kept?

Answer

1. the proposed process for updating the Roadmap and the date on which a revised version will be presented;

A.  The Minister for the Environment is currently working with ministerial colleagues to agree

the policies that will form the revised Carbon Neutral Roadmap (CNR) and delivery plan for 2027-2030. This will be published by the end of Q1 2027.

2. how the update process differs from the original and whether a Citizens' Assembly or equivalent will be held and, if not, why not;

A.  The revised CNR will not revisit the evidence base or alter the overall strategic direction,

which remains achieving net zero by 2050. A Citizens' Assembly will not be held as the strategic direction has not changed and the time and cost of a Citizens' Assembly are therefore not felt to be proportionate.

Officer time and the Climate Emergency Fund will be used on the practical transition away from fossil fuels rather than on further deliberations and as such the revision will focus on the 2027- 2030 policy delivery plan.

The Climate Council was convened and published their report in 2025 and their findings, including from a public survey, are feeding into the revised plan. In line with the discussions with the Council concerning the fact that the first delivery plan was too complex and wide-reaching, the revision will be for a simpler and more focussed action plan that prioritises the key policies. The intent is that a simpler, more focussed programme can reduce governance and administration overheads, be more effective and deliver more value for money.

3. the proposed stakeholders to be involved in the revision and how their views will be recorded and published;

A.  Extensive stakeholder engagement undertaken as part of the active workstreams across

2022-2026 are feeding into the delivery plan for 2027-2030. These include activities such as the long-standing heating industry engagement programme, the Policy Centre Jersey waste event, petrol and diesel phase out consultation, ongoing engagement work on waste and recycling and sustainable transport and regular Energy Suppliers Group meetings, amongst other things.

In addition, the Climate Council completed extensive stakeholder and public engagement, and their report is informing the revised workstream.

4. the measures to be used to determine whether a policy is "practical" and "affordable", including whether affordability will be assessed for households, businesses, public finances or all three; what cost or distributional thresholds will apply, and whether the long-term cost of not acting will be included in that assessment;

A.  In order to agree the policies in the revised CNR I will be asking officers to provide

sufficient  evidence  that  the  policy  can  be  implemented  effectively  with  available capabilities, is clear and deliverable, and can be delivered within the funding available through the Climate Emergency Fund.

Its costs should be proportionate to its expected benefits and should not place unreasonable burdens  on  government,  businesses  or  households.   It  will  also  need  to  demonstrate  its effectiveness in terms of delivering carbon reductions per pound spent, or indirectly through its enabling impact (e.g. education and awareness campaigns). I will also specifically look at the impact of policies on low-income households and other key sectors to ensure alignment with the principle of a Just Transition.

The long-term cost to the economy of not acting to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and incurring the costs of adapting to a changing climate remains a key consideration driving our decarbonisation plans.

5. which evidence in the current Roadmap is no longer fit for purpose, what new evidence will be commissioned including who will produce it and whether it will be published;

A.  The revised CNR will not revisit the evidence base or alter the overall strategic direction,

which remains achieving net zero by 2050.

The key additional piece of evidence is the Island's greenhouse gas model which has been revised inhouse by officers to understand the potential carbon reduction impact of proposed policies and this tool will used to explore the likely impact of different combinations of proposed policies and inform the most cost-effective decarbonisation programme.

The previous Environment Minister made the decision that we would not be purchasing carbon offsets as part of our decarbonisation strategy (see sequestration and offset update) and therefore carbon neutrality at 2030 is no longer a target. Any part of the evidence base that references the policies and cost of carbon neutrality by 2030 are therefore redundant.

6. the estimated amount required for the revised Roadmap and any measures to be taken to increase the Climate Emergency Fund; and

A.  The policies identified in the revised roadmap for delivery in 2027-2030 will be achievable

within  the  current  Climate  Emergency  Fund  envelope.   This  is  forecast  to  have approximately £4m per year income that arises from the 9p / litre fuel duty hypothecation into the Climate Emergency fund.

Budget 2027 identifies work planned to review a replacement for fuel duty in recognition that fuel

duty receipts are decreasing with the transition to electric vehicles.

7. whether the 2030 interim emissions target will be kept?"

A.  The Climate Council report found that the interim emission reduction targets for 2030 and

2035 of 68% and 78% from 1990 levels were now out of reach for the Island but that net zero by 2050 remained achievable. The focus for the revised Carbon Neutral Roadmap will therefore be the long-term changes needed between now and 2050 to reach the overarching target of net zero. This remains a challenging and ambitious target.

11. Deputy  H.L.   Jeune  of  St.  John,  St.  Lawrence  and   Trinity  of  the  Minister  for Infrastructure regarding the Northern sewer network upgrades. (WQ.187/2026)

Question

In relation to the Northern sewer network upgrades, will Minister advise –

1. the expected completion date of the upgrades for each individual section and the full length of the road;
2. any planned works in the next five years to include, but not be limited to, works by Jersey Electricity, Jersey Water, Jersey Gas, telecommunications providers or the Government, in each case detailing the purpose, the expected timing, and the section of road affected;
3. what steps were taken before the upgrades began to coordinate with the utility companies, so that any planned cabling, pipework or ducting could be laid while the roads were open; and, if any utility declined or was not asked, explain why;
4. whether any legal or policy restriction exists that stops a newly resurfaced road from being dug up again within a set period (except for emergency works), and if so, how long it lasts and whether it would apply to any road affected by the Upgrades; and
5. what consideration has been given to the condition of the Parish lanes and by-roads currently being used as diversions during the upgrades?

Answer

1. The Northern Sewer Network Upgrades project comprises approximately 2.5km of sewer upsizing works from 400mm diameter to 600mm diameter pipework. The upgrades are being delivered under two contracts, Phase 1a and Phase 1b. Construction commenced on 04 November 2025. At present:

- Phase 1a (Bellozanne Valley to Union Inn crossroads) has a contractual Completion Date of 07 May 2027. Approximately 76% of the works have been completed and the contractor is currently on course to meet the completion date.

- Phase 1b (Union Inn crossroads to Sion Village) has a contractual Completion Date of 26 May 2027 with the contractor targeting completion by this date. Progress was impacted  by  conflicts  with  existing  Jersey  Water  infrastructure,  requiring  the

installation of a temporary overland water main. Construction of the new sewer recommenced on 21September 2026 and  approximately 55% of the foul  sewer upgrades have been completed.

As construction progresses sequentially through La Grande Route de St Jean, which has been divided into a number of Work Areas, reinstatement and reopening of completed sections are undertaken progressively as the works advance.

2. The Government of Jersey does not hold a definitive programme of all future utility company works over a five-year period. Utility providers regularly review, amend and reprioritise  their  investment  programmes  in  response  to  operational,  customer  and regulatory requirements.

Prior to commencing major highway resurfacing works resulting in embargo restrictions applied to  resurfaced  highways,  the  I&E  Highway  team  consult  with  utility  providers  through  the established roadworks coordination process to identify known planned works and opportunities for coordination. While some future utility projects may already be identified at a strategic level, detailed programmes, timings and extents are often not sufficiently developed to enable them to be incorporated into a scheme several years in advance.

3. Prior  to  construction  commencing,  the  Department  undertook  the  normal  utility coordination processes which included consultation, obtaining statutory utility records, carrying out site investigations and engaging with utility providers to identify existing apparatus and any known planned works. Dual working opportunities are sought at the planning  stage,  and  utility  companies  are  encouraged  to  work  together  to  minimise disruption. Opportunities for dual working must, however, be balanced against factors such as  available  road  space,  the  extent  and  duration  of  the  works,  traffic  management requirements, limited working windows and, most importantly, the safety of both the workforce  and  road  users.  Where  these  considerations  cannot  be  satisfactorily accommodated, dual working is not considered appropriate.

The design of the new upgraded foul sewer was developed using information provided by the various utilities and included consideration of existing infrastructure. Utility providers were afforded opportunities to identify planned works that could potentially be undertaken alongside the sewer upgrade project though the roadworks coordination system (TrafficWorx'); the monthly road works coordination meetings which are attended by all utility companies, highway authorities and the emergency services; and, in accordance with statutory processes to apply for permits to implement road closures.

Notwithstanding these activities, coordination is ongoing between the I&E Li quid Waste team and Jersey Water to replace the existing water main through Sion Village within the same excavation for the new foul sewer, and coordination with Jersey Electricity to enable a new connection and network upgrades to be completed in Sion Village for the Affordable Housing site in Field T1404 under the current road closure.

I am not aware of any utility company declining an invitation to participate in the coordination process.

4. The Road Works (Embargo Periods and Protected Roads) (Jersey) Regulations 2017 provide at Article (2):

2) Embargo periods

The length of time referred to in the definition "embargo period" in Article28(1) of the Law commencing on the date substantial highway authority works are completed is–

1. 5years where the substantial highway authority works comprised construction (including enhanced surfacing) or reconstruction of a carriageway;
2. 3years  where  the  substantial  highway  authority  works  comprised  resurfacing  of  a carriageway;

(c) 5years where the substantial highway authority works comprised enhanced surfacing of a paved road other than a carriageway;

4. 1year where the substantial highway authority works comprised any of the following–

(i) construction (excluding enhanced surfacing), (ii) reconstruction,

(iii) resurfacing,

of a paved road other than a carriageway."

Where excavation of a recently resurfaced road is required, the Highways Authority may impose enhanced reinstatement requirements and other conditions through the Roadworks Permit process to protect the structural integrity of the highway asset, to preserve the Public's investment in the road. Emergency works remain permissible where required to maintain essential services or public safety, again where embargoed these will be subject to enhanced reinstatement conditions.

The nature of the northern sewer upgrade works mean that they do not fall within the remit of Article 2 of these Regulations.

5. Parish roads remain under the administration of the relevant Parish highway authority, which retains responsibility for their repair and maintenance. Temporary use as a diversion route does not transfer that responsibility to Government or create an automatic liability for deterioration caused by the ordinary passage of traffic.

Diversion routes are selected having regard to their condition and suitability to accommodate reasonable levels of lawful traffic, together with any legal restrictions and temporary traffic- management requirements.  Before the closures  began, photographic  condition  surveys were undertaken of the affected Parish roads. The routes continue to be inspected, and the project team remains in liaison with the relevant Parishes.

The surveys and inspections allow any specific damage directly attributable to the project's works or activities to be distinguished from pre-existing defects or ordinary traffic-related deterioration. Any identified project-related damage will be considered with the relevant Parish, without altering the respective highway authorities' statutory responsibilities.

12. Deputy H.L. Jeune of St. John , St. Lawrence and Trinity of the Minister for Housing regarding the commitment to assisted purchase schemes in the Proposed Common Strategic Policy 2026-2030. (WQ.188/2026)

Question

In relation to the commitment to assisted purchase schemes in the Proposed Common Strategic Policy 2026-2030, will the Minister –

1. describe the assisted purchase schemes he intends to introduce or expand, stating whether these will be new schemes or a continuation of existing arrangements, such as Andium Homes' assisted purchase homes or the Government's shared equity and deposit loan schemes;
2. advise whether his department will be responsible for delivering these schemes, and if not, state which body or bodies will provide them;
3. explain why no specific funding for assisted purchase schemes appears in the Proposed Budget 2027-2030, and whether the Government intends to set a specific budget for such schemes and, if so, when;
4. set out which section of the population the schemes will target, and what evidence of housing need this targeting is based on; and
5. state how many households he expects to help into home ownership through these schemes during this term  of office, and how progress  will be measured and  reported to  the Assembly?

Answer

1. As part of the commitment to help more Islanders into home ownership, I am considering the role assisted home ownership schemes can play in achieving that objective.

Given the early stage of the Ministerial term, it would be premature to specify whether this will involve new schemes, the expansion of existing arrangements, or a combination of both. Andium Homes' Homebuy scheme continues to provide an established route into home ownership, having assisted 725 households since 2014. It continues to deliver up to 60 assisted purchase sales each year from its existing housing stock, while a further 123 assisted purchase homes are anticipated through the Bridging Island Plan developments, subject to the necessary approvals. The recently completed First Step scheme has also provided useful evidence to inform policy development. There is currently no deposit loan scheme, as the former scheme closed to new applications in 2013.

Future decisions on any such initiatives will be informed by housing need, market conditions and an assessment of how public funds can best be used to help Islanders access home ownership.

More broadly, the States of Jersey Development Company is progressing its development of the Westward scheme, which will provide an additional 35 shared equity homes for Islanders, and we will continue explore future opportunities on States' owned land that is no longer required, in accordance with Policy H5 of the Bridging Island Plan.

2. It is too early to determine delivery arrangements before decisions have been taken on the nature of any future scheme.

Andium Homes already delivers the Homebuy scheme and recently delivered the First Step scheme on behalf of the Minister for Housing. That experience will be an important consideration when future delivery arrangements are assessed.

3. No specific funding has been included in the proposed Budget 2027-2030 because no decisions have yet been taken on the form, scale or timing of any future assisted home ownership scheme.

Any future proposal would need to be considered alongside other Government priorities and the overall fiscal position. Whilst I am committed to helping more Islanders into home ownership and supporting housing mobility, it is important that any intervention represents an appropriate and proportionate use of public funds consistent with the Council of Ministers' commitment spending under control and restore financial discipline.

4. Assisted purchase schemes have traditionally focused on first-time buyers, and I expect that group will remain an important consideration. However, I am also interested in how assisted home ownership schemes can support housing mobility by helping Islanders move up the property ladder as their circumstances change.

Any future targeting will be informed by evidence of housing need, housing affordability, market conditions and where support can make the greatest difference.

5. It would be premature to set a target for the number of households assisted before decisions have been taken on the nature of any future scheme and the funding available.

Any future scheme would be accompanied by appropriate measures of success, including the number of households supported and the extent to which it assists households who would not otherwise have been able to access home ownership.

13. Deputy K.M. Wilson of St. Clement of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding  the  plans  for  the  Jersey  Care  Commission  to  begin  regulating  hospital, ambulance and Government-provided mental health services. (WQ.189/2026)

Question

Will the Minister provide an update on the plans for the Jersey Care Commission to begin regulating hospital services, ambulance services and Government-provided mental health services, including the timetable for inspections by the Commission?

Answer

The relevant legislation came into force on 6 April 2026. Hospital services, ambulance services and Government-provided mental health services are required to apply for registration with the Jersey Care Commission (the Commission) by 6 October 2026. The Commission has been working with these services to support their preparation for regulation, including providing information on registration, statutory notifications and the inspection process.

Once registered, these services will be subject to the Commission's independent regulatory oversight, including statutory notifications and ongoing monitoring. A phased programme of inspections is planned to commence in 2027. The Commission will determine the timing and focus of each inspection, having regard to the information available following registration. Inspection reports will be published on the Commission's website following the Commission established approach to transparency and accountability.

The Commission's inspection handbook, service-specific standards and frequently asked questions are available on its website. The Commission plans to provide further comms/information about the scope of regulation and the inspection programme after the registration process has concluded.

14. Deputy K.M. Wilson of St. Clement of the Minister for Planning and Regulation regarding planning reforms. (WQ.190/2026)

Question

Further to the publication of the Common Strategic Policy 2026-2030 and the Minister's stated intentions around planning reform, will he advise –

1. the specific planning processes he intends to reform during 2027;
2. the expected reduction in processing time;
3. how the cost and value of these reforms will be measured; and
4. how he intends to assess whether the reforms have reduced unnecessary regulation without detrimentally affecting planning safeguards?

Answer

The reduction of unnecessary regulation and red tape, including within the planning system, is a specific commitment of the proposed Common Strategic Policy 2026 to 2030. In support of that objective, the Minister for Planning and Regulation is developing a programme of planning reform to make the planning system simpler, more proportionate and more responsive, whilst maintaining appropriate environmental, heritage and community safeguards.

1. Much  beneficial  change  and  improvement  has  already  been  delivered  in  the performance of the island's planning service. The reforms being developed now and into 2027 will continue to build on this. The areas under consideration include the revision of elements of the Island Plan and its associated planning policy framework; the review and simplification of supplementary planning guidance; further expansion of permitted development rights; monitoring and review of application validation and the continued modernisation of digital planning services.

Lasting  improvement  is  also  dependent  upon  organisational  culture  and  a  commitment  to customer-focused  service  delivery.  The  reforms  will,  therefore,  seek  to  embed  a  more proportionate,  risk-based  and  evidence-led  approach  to  planning,  ensuring  that  regulatory requirements are focused on matters of genuine public interest and supported by robust evidence. Work will continue to enhance the application validation process with three and six month reviews of the recently implemented improved validation and consultation matrix.

2. The objective of the reform programme is to improve the efficiency, consistency and responsiveness of the planning system. No specific target reduction in, for example, planning application processing times has, therefore, been established. This is because the programme comprises a range of interrelated reforms across the service, the impact of which will need to be assessed as they are developed and implemented.

The intention is to make the wider planning system simpler and more accessible, and to promote certainty and confidence in faster decision-making, whilst maintaining quality and appropriate safeguards  to  deliver  robust  planning  outcomes.  The  key  performance  indicator  for  the determination of planning applications remains the percentage of planning applications determined within eight weeks (minor applications) and 13 weeks (major applications) - the performance target is 85%, and at present 90% of applications are determined within the target timeframe, or within a period agreed with the applicant.

3. The costs associated with implementing planning reforms will be managed through the normal processes of Government business planning, project governance and budget oversight.

The value of the reforms will be assessed through established and enhanced planning service performance information, together with the delivery and reporting of specific commitments, actions and outcomes arising from the reform programme.

Stakeholder  feedback,  user  engagement  and  service  data  will  provide  an  evidence-based assessment of the extent to which reforms improve clarity, accessibility, transparency, efficiency and the overall experience of those interacting with the planning system, whilst maintaining confidence in the quality and integrity of planning decision making.

4. The Minister's intention is to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy and delay rather than weaken planning safeguards.

In line with the Common Strategic Policy's emphasis on economic growth and competitiveness, the Minister will consider the extent to which planning reforms help to facilitate investment, support business activity and enable the timely delivery of homes and infrastructure, whilst continuing to safeguard the island's environment, heritage and quality of life. The Minister will, therefore, assess reforms against their ability to deliver the sustainable development of the island.

15. Deputy S.J. Gleave of St. Helier South of the Chief Minister regarding the 2027 staffing estimates included within the Annex to the Proposed Budget 2027-2030. (WQ.191/2026)

Question

Will the Chief Minister advise, for each Ministerial department and non-Ministerial body included within the Annex to the proposed Budget 2027-2030, and as at the date used to prepare the 2027 staffing estimates –

1. the total number of full-time equivalent (FTE) posts, broken down by whether those posts were funded or unfunded;
2. the number of funded FTE posts that were occupied;
3. the number of individual employees represented by the occupied FTE;
4. the number of funded FTE posts that were vacant;
5. the number of funded vacant FTE that had remained vacant for –

1. less than three months;
2. three to six months;

(iii)six to twelve months; and (iv) more than twelve months;

6. the total budgeted staff cost;
7. the annualised payroll cost of occupied posts; and
8. any vacancy and turnover allowance included in the staff-cost budget;

and will he provide the definitions used by Government when reporting staffing reductions, distinguishing  between  reductions  in  total  posts,  funded  posts,  occupied  FTE,  employee headcount, payroll expenditure and recurring cash savings?

Answer

1. FTEs  are  published  for  each  department  in  the  Proposed  Budget  Annex  2027-2030, summarised below.

FTE figures include roles that are recharged to Funds.

2. Actual FTE is published in the  Public Sector Staffing Statistics Report (see p.4 and 5), summarised below.
3. Headcount is  published in  the  Public Sector Staffing Statistics Report  (see p.4  and 5), summarised below.

(c ) (b)