Lifelong Learning (S.R.3/2026): joint response of the Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning and the Minister for Sustainable Economic Development
This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
LIFELONG LEARNING (S.R.3/2026): JOINT RESPONSE OF THE
MINISTER FOR EDUCATION AND LIFELONG LEARNING AND THE MINISTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Ministerial Response to:
Ministerial Response required by:
Review title: Scrutiny Panel:
S.R.3/2026
27th March 2026
Lifelong Learning
Children, Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel
INTRODUCTION
The Ministers thank the Scrutiny Panel for its work on this review and for the contributions received from the Youth Assembly, stakeholders and members of the public. Thanks, are also extended to the officers who supported the process.
Ministers welcome the Panel's acknowledgement that vocational routes at Levels 2 and 3 continue to perform strongly and provide reliable entry pathways into employment. High completion rates across adult learning programmes and strong apprenticeship participation reflect the quality of existing provision.
The Ministers note that several of the Panel's recommendations relate to activity that is already planned or already taking place. The Investing in Jersey programme includes a new Highlands campus in St Helier, supported by comprehensive feasibility work of the type recommended. Similarly, Skills Jersey already delivers wide ranging communications and outreach activity through publications, events and ongoing school engagement, consistent with the Panel's suggestions.
The timelines proposed in many of the Panel's recommendations would fall within the pre-election period beginning on 20 April 2026, which would make committing to such actions inappropriate for the current Ministers. Responses to recommendations reflect this.
The Ministers also note that the scope of the review does not reflect the full breadth of lifelong learning. The exclusion of higher education (Level 4 and above) removes a significant component of the island's progression routes, including higher level apprenticeships delivered locally, which play a key role in enabling adults to retrain, strengthen their skills and access senior roles within their sector.
The Ministers value the Panel's wider observations, including the need to address gender disparities across pathways and the emphasis on improving inclusion and tackling barriers affecting different groups.
These insights provide an important contribution that will help inform future prioritisation for the next government term, and the Ministers thank the Panel for highlighting these matters.
FINDINGS
| Findings | Comments |
1 | Highlands College remains the primary hub for vocational learning, delivering around 90% of provision. Apprenticeships span sectors such as construction, hospitality, early years, engineering, and hairdressing. | Agreed |
2 | Private sector training exists but is fragmented and largely led by individual organisations. Provision is uneven across sectors and lacks a coherent ecosystem | The relocation of the Highlands campus creates an opportunity to explore how independent training providers could be better accommodated, supporting collaboration and potential economies of scale. Private providers remain independent businesses, so Government cannot mandate cohesion across the sector, but closer links between Skills Jersey and these providers could strengthen public messaging and improve visibility of available learning options. |
3 | There is no central information point for apprenticeships and vocational opportunities. Learners and employers cannot easily see the full range of options across public and private providers. | Skills Jersey is the central information point for apprenticeships and vocational opportunities in Jersey. The department promotes opportunities through social media, the Jersey Skills Show, and careers advice which is delivered in schools and is available to all adults. |
4 | Apprenticeship participation varies significantly by sector. Some pathways are growing while others are in decline, indicating misalignment between provision and labour-market demand. | Skills Jersey monitors apprenticeship participation across sectors and works with employers and providers like Highlands to understand shifts in demand. A decline in participation does not automatically indicate reduced labourmarket demand or any |
|
| misalignment; it can also reflect lower interest from prospective learners. A transition period is always appropriate before any course closure, to confirm whether reduced uptake reflects genuine change in industry need or a temporary fluctuation, and this process is followed before any decisions are made. |
5 | Care apprenticeships have declined despite rising workforce needs, but no research has isolated the causes. | The reduced enrolment recorded in 2024 reflected a misunderstanding on financial support available following a change in a stafftraining coordinator role. Skills Jersey has since worked with the team to clarify available financial support, and enrolments for 2025 have returned to usual levels. |
6 | The Government of Jersey holds quantitative data on apprenticeships but lacks qualitative insight into motivations and barriers for learners and providers. | Skills Jersey already gathers qualitative insight through regular engagement with industry, learners and providers. This insight informed the priority funding of the Skills Development Scheme and will be shared more widely through forthcoming Skills Improvement Reports. Qualitative insight on apprenticeships and young people's views on vocational options was gathered through consultation activity in 2025 with findings published early 2026. |
7 | Jersey is highly exposed to UK qualification reforms due to curricular and awarding-body alignment. Changes to Level 3 pathways directly affect local continuity, choice, and suitability of vocational pathways. The withdrawal of BTECs risks narrowing choice and flexibility for learners. Even gradual phase-out in England undermines the support system (awarding bodies, resources, training) that Jersey relies on. | Jersey is affected by UK qualification reform, and changes to Level 3 pathways do present potential risks but also opportunities. The withdrawal of some existing qualifications may reduce choice, but new options such as the forthcoming V Levels also create potential to broaden the local offer. Particularly the potential to combine academic and vocational qualifications. |
|
| Following the announcement of the outcomes of the post-16 review in December 2024, proactive engagement began with other Crown Dependencies and UK officials in early 2025. This engagement will continue, recent developments have secured qualification stability until 2029. |
8 | Key details about V Levels remain unclear. If they mirror T Levels, they may be unsuitable for Jersey given extensive placement demands. T Level style placement requirements are impractical in a small jurisdiction. | The design of V Levels is still in development; there is currently no indication that they will include the same industry placement requirement as T Levels. UK consultation materials describe V Levels as smaller, A Level sized qualifications intended for students who wish to explore options rather than specialise, whereas T Levels are larger, specialist programmes that explicitly require a 45-day industry placement. No such requirement has been indicated for V Levels at this stage. |
9 | The Panel found that vocational learning opportunities are available to 14- to 16- year-olds from only two secondary schools, due to the capacity issues at Highlands College. | Agreed. The relocation of the Highlands campus presents an opportunity to scope capacity to expand this programme. |
10 | Stakeholder experiences indicate that accessibility challenges are not fully reflected in official monitoring. Lived experiences highlight persistent barriers despite assurances of increasing inclusivity. | Challenges for mature, mid-career learners seeking modular, flexible, part-time options to fit around existing commitments are acknowledged. It is also noted that outcomes for students with SEND remain strong, with 289 receiving targeted support last year, 92% reporting improved independent study skills and 95% increased confidence in their skills and knowledge. . |
11 | Adult participation in apprenticeships is strong, but gender imbalance is pronounced. Around three-quarters of apprentices are male, contrasting with | Agreed |
| more gender balanced sixth-form participation. |
|
12 | Neurodivergent learners face environmental, structural, and support- related barriers. Access, adjustments, and continuity of support remain inconsistent across settings. | Noted |
13 | Adult learners, especially mid-career and women, face significant cost and flexibility barriers. Limited part-time and modular options and income constraints inhibit participation and progression. | Noted |
14 | Financial barriers remain significant due to upfront fees, lost earnings, and limited support for retraining and career changers. These pressures disproportionately affect adults seeking to re-enter or pivot within the labour market. | The Skills Development Scheme provides targeted support for providers and learners, including setup funding and tuitionfee subsidies. These subsidies are generally not restricted by prior qualifications, and funding can support retraining or career change where there is clear evidence of a skills shortage. Support must balance individual aspirations with the Island's identified skills needs, as funding multiple qualifications at the same level without labourmarket justification would place pressure on budgets and divert resources from essential services without an evidenced return. |
15 | Adult education programmes at Highlands show high completion and attainment. Where learners enrol, outcomes are generally positive, indicating good delivery quality. | Agreed |
16 | Routes for reskilling and career-changes are limited outside core sectors. Entry- level pathways are clearer in construction, hospitality, hair and beauty, and health and social care than in other fields. | Entry level vocational routes are naturally strongest in sectors with sustained employer demand and established apprenticeship frameworks. Publicly funded provision for adults must reflect this demand to ensure programmes are viable and deliver value for learners and employers. While pathways in some emerging or specialist fields may be less developed, this reflects differing levels of industry need rather than a |
|
| lack of commitment to wider reskilling. Skills Jersey along with Highlands continues to work with employers to identify evolving requirements and to support development of pathways where evidence shows growing demand |
17 | Private providers meet recognised standards but face resourcing challenges. Operating without subsidies or structured support constrains sustainability and growth. | The Panel will be aware of the next steps in policy development identified in the recently published report Apprenticeship Funding: Stakeholder Perspectives.' A revised grant structure is already in development, including options to broaden access and support higher-cost subjects. [1] Support for growth is also available through the Skills Development Scheme, which can help meet the upfront cost of establishing new courses in identified skills shortage areas. |
18 | Employer engagement is distributed across multiple bodies rather than centrally coordinated. This diffuses data gathering and can delay coherent system-level responses. | Skills Jersey is the central lead for employer engagement on behalf of Government. Strong and consistent industry participation across programmes such as Trident, the Higher Education Fair, the Jersey Skills Show, and career insight presentations with guest speakers from industry, demonstrates an effective working relationship with employers. Skills Jersey officers also work closely with policy colleagues in the Cabinet Office and the Economy Department. Joint work is delivered through cross department officer groups, ensuring coordinated engagement activity. |
19 | Direct financial support for employer- led training is limited beyond apprenticeships. Existing schemes tend to fund programmes rather than employer-specific upskilling. | The Skills Grant provided through the Better Business Grant by Jersey Business (which supports businesses adjust to the living wage in 2025 and 2026), provides grants to employers for training that builds leadership, digital capability, or operational skills. This does not name specific programmes but provides grants to employers for training they have identified as beneficial to their business |
20 | Vocational routes at Levels 2–3 for young entrants are well established and perform strongly. These pathways are a reliable entry point into work. | Agreed |
21 | Progression beyond Level 3 is often unclear, with gaps at higher technical and degree levels. Limited local pathways constrain advanced skills development. | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning notes that level 4 and above is higher education and therefore outside the scope of the review as defined by the panel.2 Availability of programmes beyond Level 3 is driven by demand, and local pathways are therefore focused on areas where employer need supports viable delivery. Highlands, working with Skills Jersey and industry, already offers higher level routes in construction, counselling, engineering, education related professional development, business and leadership, accounting, social work, sport, and digital, with pathways in nursing, midwifery and operating department practice supported through the Health and Care Jersey Education Department. In other specialist fields where the employment base is too small to sustain on island provision, higher level study can be pursued through distance learning combined with on- the-job training or periodic off island training. Financial support for higher level technical or degree courses does |
2 Education (Jersey) Law 1999 Schedule 2, Courses of Higher Education
|
| not require training to be delivered locally, allowing individuals and employers to identify the most suitable progression route. |
22 | The skills element of the Better Business Support Package under- performed under a 50:50 match model. The programme ends on 31 December 2026, prompting the need for redesign to improve uptake. | Noted. |
23 | Eligibility for the Better Business Support Package lacks clarity among stakeholders. | Eligibility for the Better Business Support Package, aimed to support employers transition to the living wage in 2025 and 2026, was clearly communicated through Government and Jersey Business Limited (JBL) announcements and in multiple ways. Specifically, Jersey Business has delivered a consistent multi-channel communications programme throughout 2025 specifically designed to raise the grant scheme's profile, explain eligibility and guide applicants. This will continue during 2026. 14 in-person information sessions (667 attendees), plus various other events across the year, provided repeated opportunities for businesses to receive clear, inperson explanations of eligibility. The BBG webpages received 5,653 views overall, with 4,200 views of specific guidance. The Eligibility Checker was used 1,739 times. This demonstrates strong access to and stakeholder use of clear project and eligibility information. In terms of public campaigns, the We'll Fund the Rest' campaign, for example, simplified the offer and reinforced key eligibility messages across digital, social and physical channels. |
|
| There was also targeted messaging around the BBG funding. Blogs, social posts, newsletters (with 12.7% subscriber growth) and a BBGfocused email (25 March 2025) with a 56.7% open rate show stakeholders were not only reached but engaged. Other outreach included supplier activation events, JEP supplements and engagement with 13 skills providers ensured reach and consistent understanding across the whole delivery network. Very high application activity shows eligibility was clearly understood. 305 total applications, with 237 approved, demonstrates that businesses clearly understood eligibility well enough to apply successfully. Jersey Business also supported those that didn't fully meet the eligibility criteria, working with applicants to help them understand the scheme further and to reassess how their applications and projects might be improved to be more aligned. Applicants rated the process highly. Jersey Business's NPS score is 93%. This NPS level indicates that there were clear expectations and user experience was positive. |
24 | Sole traders without staff are excluded from the Better Business Support Package due to wage-linked criteria. No support exists for sole-person businesses to hire their first employee, apprentice, or trainee. This creates a structural barrier to expanding training capacity in the economy and passing on skills in more niche sectors. | This is incorrect. Sole-person businesses who hire their first employees, and thereby cease to be sole-traders, are eligible under the Better Business Support Scheme. |
25 | The Highlands College estate is outdated and constrains industry- standard delivery. Facilities limit access to modern equipment and limit the range of courses. The estate presents | Agreed. The proposed relocation of Highlands College to St Helier is a priority of the Investing In Jersey Programme announced in August 2025. This presents an opportunity to |
| significant barriers for accessibility and inclusivity. | provide the island with a modern, fit- for-purpose campus. |
26 | The absence of a shared lifelong- learning hub reduces coordination and visibility. A central hub could enable collaboration, signposting, and economies of scale. | Agreed. Capacity to establish a hub' that accommodates both state-funded and private providers will be considered as part of the scoping work to relocate Highlands College. |
27 | Funding rules are complex and difficult to navigate. Ambiguity around eligibility, pathways, and exceptions causes confusion for parents, learners, employers, and providers. | There is limited evidence from submissions that funding rules, in general, are complex or difficult to navigate. Most comments instead relate to circumstances where funding is unavailable or capped for specific groups or qualifications, which reflects the correct and intended application of existing policy rather than ambiguity in the rules themselves. There is recognition that 2 separate schemes which fund apprenticeships based on qualification level can cause confusion and moving toward a single, unified approach would help improve clarity and public understanding. |
28 | Restrictions on second-degree funding limit adult retraining even in shortage areas. This caps workforce mobility and slows responses to emerging needs. | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning notes that university degrees are outside the scope of the panel's review. It is not clear from the submissions whether restrictions on seconddegree funding are affecting adult retraining in shortage areas. Where workforce pressures were mentioned, no analysis was provided to show that these constitute recognised skills shortages or that additional degreelevel training would address them. It was not demonstrated that the issues arise from a lack of support for a second degree rather than from factors more typical of labourmarket shortages, such as high staff turnover or limits on employers' capacity to |
|
| recruit and supervise newly qualified and inexperienced staff. |
29 | Skills forecasting is limited and inconsistent across sectors. Without a stronger evidence base, policy and commissioning risk lagging market shifts. | Skills analysis undertaken through Skills Jersey is consistent and informed by a robust evidence base. A strengthened analytical approach was introduced in 2025 as part of the redesign of the Skills Development Scheme, ensuring that decisions draw on both quantitative labour market data and qualitative insight. This includes analysis of sector trends, vacancy patterns and participation rates, combined with regular engagement with employers, training providers, and insight from Skills Jersey's careers and mentoring teams. External intelligence is also reviewed, including the UK's published shortage occupation data and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training's Skills Forecast, to ensure that local analysis is informed by wider macroeconomic trends but interpreted through the context of Jersey's specific needs. This combined approach provides a consistent basis for identifying emerging requirements, and findings will be shared publicly through forthcoming Skills Improvement Reports |
30 | The economy's volatility reinforces the need for transferable, adaptable skills. Future-proofing skills will help individuals transition across roles and sectors. | Noted, this is a phenomenon which can be observed worldwide. |
31 | Learners and employers face comparatively high costs with no statutory entitlements. This reduces participation and makes provider planning more precarious. | It is not clear from submissions that the absence of statutory entitlements is reducing participation, nor did they quantify how many learners chose not to enrol due to costs. A range of free or subsidised options is already available through policy, |
|
| including free sixth form education for those under 19, apprenticeship support, the statutory Skills Bursary, and the Skills Development Scheme. Higher apprenticeship costs tend to arise where fees exceed available support, which can occur for the small number training with private providers rather than Highlands; this is being considered as part of the development of a revised apprenticeship subsidy scheme. Some funding gaps are noted, such as professional qualifications outside apprenticeship or higher education routes and second chance adult learning such as maths, English, and access to higher education courses. Addressing these specific gaps is the key issue, regardless of whether support is delivered through policy or statutory entitlement. |
32 | Vocational routes remain culturally undervalued relative to academic pathways. Perceptions hinder uptake and recruitment, unlike in countries where vocational education is valued highly. | There is recognition that perceptions of vocational learning are influenced both by the separation of academic and vocational routes in the current curriculum and by the need to modernise the vocational learning environment. Planned investment, including the relocation of Highlands, will help update facilities, while greater collaboration between post-16 providers could reduce the structural divide that reinforces comparisons between the two pathways |
33 | Provision is not sufficiently aligned to emerging skills (digital, regulatory, sustainability, AI). A coordinated, data- driven labour-market intelligence approach is needed to close widening skills gaps. | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning notes only one submission raised concerns about emerging skills such as digital, AI, and sustainability, and there was little broader evidence that demand in these areas is not being met. Existing provision already includes digital and AI courses through Highlands College and Digital |
|
| Jersey, alongside leadership, management and accounting programmes at Highlands that embed themes such as corporate responsibility, ethics and wider sustainability considerations, with content shaped by professional body standards. Sustainability is also supported on the technical side through provision linked to low carbon and infrastructure related skills, strengthened further by the recent launch of the Green Skills Academy, a partnership between Highlands College and Jersey Electricity |
RECOMMENDATIONS
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
1 | Skills Jersey, supported by CYPES, should establish and maintain a single online public portal for vocational learning, providing up-to-date information on apprenticeships, courses, providers, subsidies and trainee opportunities with clear guidance for learners, employers and providers, achieving at least 90% coverage of provision and 75% user satisfaction with a searchable catalogue, with filters, launching by Q4 2026, with quarterly updates thereafter. | Minist er for Educat ion and Lifelo ng Learni ng (MEL L) and Minist er for Sustai nable Econo mic Devel opmen t (MSE D) | Reject | Highlands College, as the provider of around 90% of vocational training provision, already delivers the level of programme information proposed through its award- winning website. Skills Jersey complements this by offering a single point of access for careers advice and guidance, including information on education, training, financial support, careers and related services. Creating an additional portal for apprenticeship |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
|
|
|
| vacancies and course listings would duplicate information held elsewhere, increase costs and staffing requirements, and add unnecessary administrative burden. This duplication would not represent efficient use of resources, particularly given current efforts to streamline the public sector. It would also introduce the risk of outdated content, as continuous monitoring would be needed. The staffing and financial requirements for a new portal would require additional budget. |
|
2 | CYPES and Skills Jersey should deliver a communications and culture change campaign that promotes vocational routes and lifelong learning through case studies, events and school/employer outreach, achieving at least two campaign waves per year, a 15% awareness uplift (pre/post survey), 20 employer champions and 10 school events per term, with the strategy approved by Q3 2026, the first wave delivered by Q3 2026 and annual reviews thereafter. | MELL and MSED | Reject | Skills Jersey already delivers the type of communications and outreach activity recommended. Its existing offer includes annual publication of Direction magazine, which features interviews and case studies from local people across a range of sectors, and an annual Jersey Skills Show with extensive employer participation and attendance from |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
|
|
|
| schools and the wider public. Skills Jersey also provides ongoing school engagement through careers advice, one-to-one guidance and industry spotlight assemblies with guest speakers. These established activities already promote vocational routes and lifelong learning through multiple channels and formats. |
|
3 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning and the Minister for Sustainable Economic Development should commission Skills Jersey to conduct targeted research into apprenticeship experiences, including motivations and barriers across sectors and a deep-dive into care and other priority sectors, publishing a report with sector-specific actions and at least 200 respondents by Q4 2026 and implementing an agreed action plan from Q1 2027 (commissioned by Q3 2026). | MELL and MSED | Reject | Changes to the children and young people's survey in 2026 will add questions on both postschool plans and the reasons for those choices. Survey results will provide better insight into student decisionmaking and support consistent analysis of behaviour changes following new or amended policy. The Ministers note that the timescales for this action conflict with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026. The Minister considers it inappropriate to |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
|
|
|
| commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
4 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning should publish an assessment of UK qualification reforms ( V and T-Levels) and BTEC viability, setting deliverable routes for Jersey and issuing a public timeline with mitigations, evidenced by a subject-level route map, a communications pack for parents, learners and employers, with a draft by Q3 2026 and publication by Q4 2026. | MELL | Partially Accept | Minister is leading a joint Crown Dependencies meeting with UK counterpart Baroness Smith. Currently UK policy on V-levels remains in development, and undertaking an assessment before the UK position is finalised would be premature and would not provide a sound basis for planning. The Minister notes that the timescales for this action conflict with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026. The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected | Ongoing |
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
|
|
|
| to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
5 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning should establish a provider transition support plan and fund to resource Highlands, Hautlieu and other providers for curriculum changes, CPD, materials, timetable redesign and student support, achieving 90% staff training in affected subjects, with the plan agreed by Q3 2026, funding live by Q4 2026 and termly reviews. | MELL | Reject | The Minister believes it is not sensible to design a scheme for financial support on a UK policy that is not yet finalised. The Ministers notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026. The Minister is unwilling to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
6 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning should, by the end of Q4 2026 complete a comprehensive assessment of Highlands College's current capacity to deliver vocational learning to 14- to 16-year-olds across all secondary schools. The Minister should develop a plan by Q1 2027 to expand vocational learning opportunities to all secondary schools by September | MELL | Partial accept | The Principal of Highlands College advised at the hearing that the current site cannot support expansion of this programme to all secondary schools. Completing an assessment based on expansion within the existing estate would therefore not be an | Ongoing |
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
| 2027 to ensure fair and equitable access for all students. |
|
| effective use of staff resource. The Investing in Jersey Fund offers an opportunity to build on the strengths of the current programme. A purposedesigned facility creates potential to expand capacity and extend the programme to all schools The proposed timelines are partially accepted as the Ministers notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026 The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
7 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, working with providers and inclusion leads, should publish an all-age accessibility and inclusion strategy for vocational learning that strengthens transition support, | MELL | Partial Accept | Highlands College Strategic Plan prioritises inclusion, putting the community first in all pillars of the college values. | Ongoing |
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
| flexible/part-time options, recognition of prior learning and additional needs pathways, drafting by Q3 2026 and implementing from Q1 2027. |
|
| The college embrace a culture of belonging where everyone regardless of background and identity, is respected. Highlands College is delivering short and part time programmes to adults promoting flexible targeted training across the provision. |
|
8 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, in partnership with Skills Jersey, providers and employers, should introduce a gender balance action plan using mentoring, bursaries and role model campaigns to address subject and sector imbalances, reducing gender imbalance by at least 10% in four priority programmes within 24 months, with the plan agreed by Q3 2026, launched by Q4 2026 and evaluated annually. | MELL | Partial Accept | Minister acknowledges there is merit in understanding representation on certain pathways. Future consideration should be given to this issue during the transition to new premises for Highlands Campus. The proposed actions are partially accepted as the Minister notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026 The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new | Ongoing |
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
|
|
|
| Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
9 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning should launch a modular, stackable and blended adult career-changer programme with guidance and recognition of prior learning for mid-career transitions, delivering at least 5 new modular offers, 100 adult enrolments in year one, with design completed by Q3 2026 and first intakes by Q1 2027. | MELL | Reject | Jersey cannot award new qualifications, as these are issued by regulated awarding bodies. The Minister is content for this arrangement to continue. Local providers, including Highlands, deliver the teaching while awarding bodies determine qualification structure, content and policies such as recognition of prior learning. This means the ability to create modular, stackable programmes depends on the awarding bodies' frameworks. The UK Government has signalled a move toward more flexible, modular and stackable provision. As these redesigned qualifications become available, education providers in Jersey can consider offering them where they fit local needs The proposed timelines are rejected |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
|
|
|
| as the Minister notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026 The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
10 | The Minister for Sustainable Economic Development should review and reform apprenticeship subsidy structures, including subsidy levels, eligibility and duration, to prioritise workforce shortage sectors, adopting new rules and increasing starts in shortage sectors by at least 15% within 12 months while maintaining employer satisfaction at or above 75%, following a review in Q3 2026 and implementation in Q4 2026. | MSED | Partially Accept | Within the scope of the Better Business Support Package only, the Skills and Apprenticeship grants have been reviewed, and the eligibility criteria will be updated for the 2026 grants. Alongside this Skills Jersey administer the apprenticeship subsidy of £1,852 per apprentice per year for training at level 3 and below. | Completed |
11 | Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, the Minister for Sustainable Economic Development and Skills Jersey should define priority sectors and skills and adjust local vocational | MELL and MSED | Partially Accept | Minister for ELL and MSED have collaborated on this topic which has resulted in a list of skills shortage areas | Ongoing |
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
| pathways, accordingly, approving a priority list by Q3 2026 and protecting or expanding at least five pathways by Q1 2027, with an annual alignment check thereafter. |
|
| requiring future investment support which will be published shortly. These will be published in forthcoming Skills Improvement Reports. Vocational pathways are already informed by an assessment of skills need in Jersey. An example being the recently launched Green Skills Academy The proposed timelines are partially accepted as the Ministers notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026 The Ministers considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
12 | CYPES and Skills Jersey should mandate standardised data returns from all learners and all providers (including private) into a single database covering participation, | MELL and MSED | Reject | CYPES and Skills Jersey already collect demographic, participation, progression and | Completed |
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
| demographics, progression and outcomes, achieving 90% provider compliance with quarterly public dashboards and embedded gap reporting, with the framework in place by Q3 2026 and the first dashboard by Q4 2026. |
|
| outcome data from learners accessing publicly funded training. This includes free sixthform education and grants or subsidies for apprenticeships and higher education. For programmes where providers receive funding directly, such as the Skills Development Scheme, key performance indicators also include participant and employer satisfaction ratings. There are benefits to improving the breadth of demographic data held on recipients of grants. There are financial and resourcing implications for collecting more extensive data which are not currently provided for. The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, should simplify and consolidate lifelong learning funding into a single, clear set of eligibility rules and entitlements supported by a public guide and calculator, completing policy consolidation and publishing guidance to achieve an 80% user satisfaction rate, following consultation in Q3 2026 and live in Q4 2026. | MELL | Reject | The proposed timelines are rejected as the Ministers notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026 The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
14 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, with the Minister for Sustainable Economic Development should establish a sustainable funding model for private providers delivering apprenticeships and training in shortage sectors, agreeing a new model that secures at least 80% provider confidence and prevents any net loss of places in shortage areas, with review in Q3 2026 and implementation in Q1 2027. | MELL and MSED | Reject | The Skills Development Scheme is now in place and performs this function. | Completed |
15 | The Minister for Sustainable Economic Development, should assess and redesign the Better Business Support Package skills element to align with employer needs, allow multi-activity | MSED | Partially reject/ partially complet ed | Please see response to Recommendation 10. BBSP for 2025 and 2026 has already been |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
| applications, increase subsidies where justified, include sole traders and first hires, and embed monitoring and evaluation, publishing an assessment and new KPIs and achieving at least 20% more funded training actions and a minimum of 15% more first- hire/trainee/apprentice cases, with assessment in Q3 2026, redesign in Q4 2026 and relaunch in Q1 2027 if results aren't achieved. |
|
| designed to be demand led (by employers). Sole traders remain out of scope for the BBSP unless they make their first hire. There is currently no allocated funding for the BBSP in 2027. |
|
16 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, should commission a feasibility study and masterplan for a modern Highlands College campus as a lifelong learning 10 hub with industry standard facilities, producing costed options and securing industry validation across at least six sectors by Q4 2026 and a preferred option decision by Q2 2027. | MELL | Reject | The work to transition the Highlands Campus into St Helier will include an extensive feasibility study which will include the factors proposed. The proposed timelines are rejected as the Ministers notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026. |
|
17 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning should, by December 2026, undertake a comprehensive review and redesign of funding arrangements for lifelong learning, post-16 education, and higher-education retraining. The redesigned model should: • Simplify and consolidate existing funding systems to ensure that eligibility criteria and entitlements are clear, consistent, and easy for learners and providers to understand. • Remove barriers that currently prevent newly arrived families | MELL | Reject | This would involve fundamental policy changes across different government departments. The proposed timelines are rejected as the Ministers notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026 |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
| from accessing funded post-16 education, ensuring fair and equitable access for all residents. • Introduce a retraining and upskilling funding pathway that enables individuals who already hold a degree to access support for study in priority workforce areas such as social work and other critical sectors. The Minister should publish the reviewed policy framework, including implementation timelines and measurable success indicators, by Q1 2027. |
|
| The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
18 | The Minister for Sustainable Economic Development, Skills Jersey and Statistics Jersey should establish a permanent Labour Market Intelligence function to produce regular skills forecasts and publish accessible insights for learners, providers and employers, issuing an annual island-wide skills report operational by Q3 2026 with the first annual report by Q4 2026. | MSED | Reject | The Skills Development Scheme is already in place and performs this function. The Economics Unit also provides Labour Market intelligence (including modelling) to Skills Jersey. | Completed |
19 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, with the Minister for Sustainable Economic Development, should introduce a formal annual Skills Policy review cycle that incorporates Labour Market Intelligence, technological change and employer feedback with the first review completed by Q1 2027 and annually thereafter. | MELL and MSED | Rejected | This is already undertaken by Skills Jersey as administrator of the Skills Development Scheme. | Completed |
20 | The Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning should establish statutory entitlements for post-16 and adult vocational learning underpinned by a dedicated, ring-fenced fund and operating the fund to achieve over | MELL | Reject | This would involve fundamental policy changes across different government departments. |
|
| Recommendations | To | Accept/ Reject | Comments | Target date of action/ completion |
| 10% year-on-year uptake growth in priority sectors, with policy design by Q3 2026 and enactment/launch by Q3 2027. |
|
| The proposed timelines are rejected as the Minister notes that the timescales for this action conflicts with the pre-election purdah period that commences on 20th April 2026 The Minister considers it inappropriate to commit to an action on matters of policy, which may have to be reserved for a new Council or Minister who might be expected to want the opportunity to take a different view. |
|
CONCLUSION
The Ministers appreciate the work undertaken by the Panel and acknowledge the intention to strengthen lifelong learning opportunities. However, it is important to recognise that the review was limited in scope. By focusing only on qualifications below degree level and primarily on vocational pathways, the exercise did not encompass the full breadth of lifelong learning, which spans all qualification levels and includes both academic and vocational routes. This has constrained the extent to which the conclusions can be considered a comprehensive assessment of lifelong learning provision.
The timeframe available for the review was also restricted, and the number of stakeholder submissions received was comparatively small. As a result, several of the wider conclusions appear to have been drawn from a narrow evidence base that may not fully reflect the views or experiences of the broader community. A more extensive programme of engagement would be necessary to produce findings that carry systemwide validity.
In addition, many of the recommendations and associated timelines for delivery would be challenging to implement in practice within the parameters of the current year. Several would require significant inyear budget reallocation that has not been planned for, while others would necessitate legislative change or substantial shifts in policy
direction across multiple departments. Good policy development requires sufficient time for analysis, crossdepartmental coordination and engagement with stakeholders to ensure proposals are well informed and aligned to user needs.
The guidance for Ministers during election periods makes clear that new longterm initiatives and major policy decisions should be deferred where possible, especially where a future Council of Ministers or Minister could be expected to take a different position. For this reason, introducing wideranging reforms at this time would not be appropriate.
The Ministers recognise the value of ongoing reflection on how lifelong learning can best support Islanders. As the landscape evolves, opportunities to strengthen provision will continue to be considered in a measured and informed way.
[1] Apprenticeship Funding - Stakeholder Perspectives