Skip to main content

Composition of the States: further debates before the outcome of the Electoral Commission (P.78-2011)

Outcome: Rejected
Vote date: 6 July 2011
Reference: P.78/2011
Proposition: Composition of the States: further debates before the outcome of the Electoral Commission.
Lodged by: Trevor Pitman
View all votes
  • Pour (For)
  • Contre (Against)
  • Abstained
  • Declared an interest
  • Absent

How Members voted

No interests declared

Simon Crowcroft Not present for vote

Simon Crowcroft

Connétable

John Le Fondré En défaut

John Le Fondré

Deputy

Ian Le Marquand Not present for vote

Ian Le Marquand

Senator

Terence Le Sueur Not present for vote

Terence Le Sueur

Senator

Judy Martin En défaut

Judy Martin

Deputy

Philip Rondel Excused attendance

Philip Rondel

Deputy

Daniel Wimberley Not present for vote

Daniel Wimberley

Deputy


What are the reasons a Member can be absent from a vote?

  • Ill – the States Member was too ill to take part in the meeting
  • En défaut – the States Member was absent from the meeting
  • Away-States business – the States Member was away from Jersey on official States business
  • Not present for vote – the States Member had been present at the meeting but was absent for this vote
  • Excused Attendance – the States Assembly agreed to excuse the States Member from the meeting
  • Parental responsibilities – the States Member was fulfilling parental responsibilities
  • Suspended – Member has been suspended from States Assembly business