Draft Road Traffic Law (Drug Driving) (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- (P.32/2026) – Children’s Rights Impact Assessment
This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.
STATES OF JERSEY
DRAFT ROAD TRAFFIC LAW (DRUG DRIVING) (JERSEY) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 202- (P.32/2026) – CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Presented to the States on 9th February 2026 by the Minister for Infrastructure
STATES GREFFE
2026 P.32 Add.
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT (CRIA)
PART 1: SCREENING
Name and title of Duty Bearer: Constable Andy Jehan
Type of Duty Bearer:
(Minister, Elected Member or States Minister
Assembly Body)
Assessment completed by (if not
Strategic Head of Road Safety completed by duty bearer):
Date: 27/11/2025
1) Name and brief description of the proposed decision Decision' means: • an Assembly proposition • an amendment (or further amendment) to a proposition • for Ministerial duty-bearers, policy under development |
Assembly proposition to propose amendments to the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956 to introduce legal limits for drug concentration in drivers and powers to conduct roadside drug testing. |
2) Which groups of children and young people are likely to be affected? Groups of children could include early years, primary or secondary education; young adults; children with additional learning needs; disabled children; children living in poverty; children from particular ethnic backgrounds; migrants; refugees; care experienced children and LGBTQ+ children |
Some children aged 16 and 17 are legally permitted to ride a powered two wheeler or drive a vehicle and would therefore be subject to the new offence if they are suspected of driving or being in charge of a motor vehicle with a concentration of a specified drug above a prescribed limit (new Article 28A). |
3) What is the likely impact of the proposed decision on children and on their rights? Impacts may be positive or negative, direct or indirect Include whether different groups of children will be affected differently by the decision |
· Direct application of criminal sanctions (arrest, testing, prosecution) to children aged 16/17 · Possible involvement of children in enforcement procedures (e.g. evidential blood tests, custody) · Safeguards for treatment of children within criminal justice process may be engaged (e.g. duty of care, legal advice, contact with parents/guardians/appropriate adult) Overall, there should be a positive impact on all children groups (as vulnerable road users) in an improvement in road safety by this change in legislation removing high risk, high harm drivers from the road. |
Page - 2
P.32/2026 Add.
4) Is a full Children's Rights Impact Assessment required? If you have identified impacts on children and their rights, a full CRIA should be completed. If no impacts are identified then a Full CRIA is not required, but please explain your rationale and how you reached this conclusion |
This legislation doesn't create new impacts on children per se, as they can already by stopped and arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs or other driving offences i.e. speeding. The way these children are processed by the Police in these scenarios are already built into legislation through the Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003. |
Page - 3
P.32/2026 Add.