Skip to main content

Amendment

Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment. (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)) – amendment. Empty Residential Properties

Published on: 1 December 2025

Lodged by: Alex Curtis

Debate date: 9 December 2025

Reference: P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd.

This content has been automatically generated from the original PDF and some formatting may have been lost, therefore it should not be relied upon to extract citations or propose amendments. Please see the PDF for the official version of the document.

STATES OF JERSEY

PROPOSED BUDGET (GOVERNMENT PLAN) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): THIRTY- FIRST AMENDMENT (P.70/2025 AMD.(31)) – AMENDMENT

Lodged au Greffe on 1st December 2025 by Deputy A.F. Curtis of St. Clement Earliest date for debate: 8th December 2025

STATES GREFFE

2025  P.70 Amd.(31) Amd.

PROPOSED BUDGET (GOVERNMENT PLAN) 2026-2029  (P.70/2025): THIRTY-FIRST AMENDMENT (P.70/2025 AMD.(31)) AMENDMENT

____________

1  PAGE 2, PARAGRAPH 1 –

For the figure "£250,000" substitute the figure "£25,000".

After the words "empty residential properties" insert the words ", such policy to be developed in-house with funding available for minor external input only if required".

 DEPUTY A.F. CURTIS OF ST. CLEMENT

Note:  After this amendment, the amendment would read as follows –

After the words "Appendix 2 – Summary Table 5(i) and (ii) of the Report", insert the words –

", except that, in "Summary Table 5(i)   Revenue Heads of Expenditure", £25,000 of the Cabinet Office Head of Expenditure for 2026 should be reserved as a ring-fenced budget line for the development of policy mechanisms to address empty residential properties, such policy to be developed in-house with funding available for minor external input only if required, with this funding not to be drawn from the existing Housing budget within the Cabinet Office Head of Expenditure".

Note:  After this amendment, the proposition would read as follows –

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion

  1. In accordance with Article 16 of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2019 (the Law) to approve an amendment to the Government Plan 2025 – 2028 (entitled "Budget 2025 – 2028") to a reduction in the 2025 head of expenditure "Grants to States Funds" as included in Table 5(i) Revenue Heads of Expenditure of that Government Plan from £119,821,000 to £69,821,000.
  2. To receive the Government Plan 2026 – 2029 (entitled "Budget 2026-2029") specified in Article 9(1) of the Law and specifically –
  1. to approve the estimate of total States income to be paid into the Consolidated Fund in 2026 as set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 1 to the Report, which is inclusive of the proposed taxation and impôts duties changes outlined in the Government Plan, in line with Article 9(2)(a) of the Law.
  2. to refer to their Act dated 24th June 2003 in which they approved that no new user pays' charges be introduced without any such charge receiving prior in principle approval by the States Assembly and accordingly to approve the introduction of two new charges, to

be levied by Health and Care Jersey to promote appropriate use of the  Emergency  Department  and  for  repeated  non-attendance  of outpatient  appointments,  detailed  in  the  section  entitled "Departmental Income Sources" as set out in the Appendix to the accompanying Report.

  1. to  approve  the  proposed  Changes  to  Approval  for financing/borrowing for 2026, as shown in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 2 to the Report, which may be obtained by the Minister for Treasury and Resources, as and when required, in line with Article 9 (2)(c) of the Law, of up to those revised approval amounts.
  2. to approve the transfers from one States fund to another for 2026 of up to and including the amounts set in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 3 in line with Article 9(2)(b) of the Law.
  3. to approve a transfer from the Consolidated Fund to the Stabilisation Fund in 2026 of up to £50 million, subject to a decision of the Minister for Treasury and Resources based on the availability of funds in the Consolidated Fund as at 31st December 2025 in excess of the estimates provided in this plan, or from budgeted underspends identified before 31st December 2026.
  4. to approve a transfer from the Consolidated Fund to the Agricultural Loans Fund in 2026 of up to £5 million, subject to a decision of the Minister for Treasury and Resources based on availability of funds in the Consolidated Fund as at 31st December 2025 in excess of estimates  provided  in  this  plan,  or  from  budgeted  underspends identified before 31st December 2026;
  5. to approve each major project that is to be started or continued in 2026 and the total cost of each such project and any amendments to the  proposed  total  cost  of  a  major  project  under  a  previously approved Government Plan, in line with Article 9(2)(d), (e) and (f) of the Law and as set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 4 to the Report.

viii.  to  approve  the  proposed  amount  to  be  appropriated  from  the

Consolidated Fund for 2026, for each head of expenditure, being gross  expenditure  less  estimated  income  (if  any),  in  line  with Articles 9(2)(g), 10(1) and 10(2) of the Law, and set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Tables 5(i) and (ii) of the Report, except that, in "Summary Table 5(i) – Revenue Heads of Expenditure", £25,000 of the Cabinet Office Head of Expenditure for 2026 should be reserved as  a  ring-fenced  budget  line  for  the  development  of  policy mechanisms to address empty residential properties, such policy to be developed in-house with funding available for minor external input only if required, with this funding not to be drawn from the existing  Housing  budget  within  the  Cabinet  Office  Head  of Expenditure.

  1. to approve the estimated income, being estimated gross income less expenditure, that each States trading operation will pay into its trading fund in 2026 in line with Article 9(2)(h) of the Law and set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 6 to the Report.
  2. to approve the proposed amount to be appropriated from each States trading  operation's  trading  fund  for  2026  for  each  head  of expenditure in line with Article 9(2)(i) of the Law and set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 7 to the Report.
  3. to approve the estimated income and expenditure proposals for the Climate Emergency Fund for 2026 as set out in Appendix 2 – Summary Table 8 to the Report.
  4. to  approve,  in  accordance  with  Article  9(1)  of  the  Law,  the Government  Plan  2026-2029,  as  set  in  the  Appendix  to  the accompanying Report.

REPORT

This  is  a  simple  amendment  to  the  31st  Amendment to  the  Proposed  Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029, lodged by the Environment, Housing and Infrastructure (EHI) Scrutiny panel, that seeks to ringfence funding for policy development to address vacant/empty residential properties.

I am a member of the EHI Scrutiny Panel and I personally support the policy direction that is proposed by this amendment – the reasons for bringing which are in the main amendment report. I also consider that a smaller ringfenced budget and a commitment to use existing officer resource for policy development is a clearer and pragmatic way to deliver policy in this area.

As stated in the amendment report, there is a mandate to deliver mechanisms to dissuade vacant residential property from P.48/2022. There is further evidence the assembly should pursue this from the findings of the Jersey Youth Assembly (JYA).

That said, I believe that across Government (and other bodies like the parishes), we do have skill and knowledge in this area to develop and investigate the key options.

It  is  key  that  all  States  Members  support  a  culture  in  Government  of  lean  and proportionate working, to ensure we can deliver within our financial means. The allocation of £250,000 at this point appears disproportionate to the stated goals.

Since 2026 is an election year, it is inevitable that final policy direction and agreement will come from the next Assembly. It is appropriate they are given policy mechanisms to work with, but it is not worthwhile designing these in detail to the point of legislation (if needed) without a clear mandate on what mechanisms to achieve the goal of dissuading vacant residential properties' are politically supported by that assembly.

I have nonetheless left some money in - £25,000, that could reasonably fund a targeted piece of work on a specific area or mechanism that may need external support.

This is an opportunity to return to nimble, agile policy development. Constraining the ringfenced budget should encourage Government to be  ambitious and creative  in utilising existing resource, such as secondments, leveraging the public more, and using academics over consultants.

Financial and staffing implications

The direct financial implication will be to reduce the allocated ringfenced' funding for this policy development by £225,000 as compared to Amendment 31. It still retains an obligation on Cabinet Office or other departments' officer resource to deliver policy work which will have a financial implication.

Children's Rights Impact Assessment

I consider that this proposition (amendment) has no direct or indirect impact on children and that the duty to have due regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child does not arise. Accordingly, a Children's Rights Impact Assessment is not required under the Children (Conventions Rights) (Jersey) Law 2022.

Related Publications

Propositions

Amendments

Comments

CRIAs

Votes

Minutes

Hansard